Royal Mail Spies Get Worried

Senior Service · Post by **Senior Service** » 01 Nov 2007, 20:32

To all you RM spies out there i hope you are taking in all the comments about the agreement and how well it is going down.

Look forward to the vote!

The NO vote is gaining momentum.

tenpole tudorsack · Post by **tenpole tudorsack** » 01 Nov 2007, 20:40

It's a big NOOOOooooooooooooooooo!!!!

hadescaveman · Post by **hadescaveman** » 01 Nov 2007, 20:42

no no no no no no no no no :cfo :lfo

Post by **baldrick** » 01 Nov 2007, 20:44

I have not spoken to one single person at work who is going to vote for this agreement (although admittedly I don't talk to strike breakers).

crocodillapig · Post by **crocodillapig** » 01 Nov 2007, 22:07

i think even the strike breakers will vote against it
even they couldnt be that stupid COULD THEY?

dongash · Post by **dongash** » 01 Nov 2007, 22:49

any "waverers " at our office were convinced to vote NO after the work time brainwashing session!!! another own goal you parasites!!!!

:cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo

Sandyman · Post by **Sandyman** » 01 Nov 2007, 23:06

To paraphrase a well known song,

NO NO
NO NO NO NO
NO NO NO NO
NO NO
There's no Crozier. :cfo

His ineptitude will lose this vote after causing such damage to Royal Mail, and he'll have to resign again, just like he did after his **** up at the FA.
Do we see a trend here? Crazier takes on a high profile high paid job and makes a horrendous mess of it. I wouldn't employ him picking fruit on minimum wage.

Post by **stephen500** » 02 Nov 2007, 04:21

baldrick wrote:I have not spoken to one single person at work who is going to vote for this agreement .

I couldn't find anyone that voted for the way forward, but that got through..some people say one thing and........

kinmad4it · Post by **kinmad4it** » 02 Nov 2007, 05:31

I've been saying the exact same thing for ages now. What worries me is royal mule somehow interfering with the ballot. If no one really did vote for the way backwards, how did it get voted in? I fear the same will happen this time. I wouldn't put it past those devious retards to try any underhanded tactic to get their own way.

tenpole tudorsack · Post by **tenpole tudorsack** » 02 Nov 2007, 06:54

Yeah, the danger here is that both RM AND the CWU are recommending it, how do we get a fair count?

meweavy · Post by **meweavy** » 02 Nov 2007, 11:31

dongash wrote:any "waverers " at our office were convinced to vote NO after the work time brainwashing session!!! another own goal you parasites!!!! :cfo :cfo :cfo :cfo

same here they had one work time learning session in front of about 30 of us,then they decided not to do any more..

because it went down like a lead balloon,and the manager was trying to sell the deal..

jafferpants · Post by **jafferpants** » 02 Nov 2007, 14:54

stephen500 wrote:
baldrick wrote:I have not spoken to one single person at work who is going to vote for this agreement .
I couldn't find anyone that voted for the way forward, but that got through..some people say one thing and.
......

How very very true!!!!

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 02 Nov 2007, 15:14

jafferpants · Post by **jafferpants** » 02 Nov 2007, 16:00

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:

TBT dont sit on the fence is it yes or no

baggee · Post by **baggee** » 02 Nov 2007, 17:40

It is a BIG FCUKING NO FROM ME.