Full timr contract

Post by **bigal383** » 14 Jan 2018, 20:33

A lad in my office has just been made to full time as hes covered a full time duty for 2 years. Iam senior to him and didnt get offered it. Sposingly this is correct. Just thought id check. As iam.happy for the guy and this is the way it should be?

ted_e_bear · Post by **ted_e_bear** » 14 Jan 2018, 21:37

No, the duty should have been open to anyone to apply for with the most senior person being successful in getting it.

rehabron · Post by **rehabron** » 14 Jan 2018, 21:40

bigal383 wrote:A lad in my office has just been made to full time as hes covered a full time duty for 2 years. Iam senior to him and didnt get offered it. Sposingly this is correct. Just thought id check. As iam.happy for the guy and this is the way it should be?

Why was the duty not advertised after 6 months?

slinder123 · Post by **slinder123** » 15 Jan 2018, 12:46

see your rep and get his full time job seniority rules end off

Post by **bigal383** » 15 Jan 2018, 13:45

What are there different rules regarding these situations surely if the lads worked the hours for yesrs he should get it before me. The duty isnt vacant but has serious health problems and nevrr on it hasnt been for a long period of time

Creditshampoo · Post by **Creditshampoo** » 15 Jan 2018, 13:59

bigal383 wrote:What are there different rules regarding these situations surely if the lads worked the hours for yesrs he should get it before me. The duty isnt vacant but has serious health problems and nevrr on it hasnt been for a long period of time

There’s not different rules. If a duty is vacant for 6 months it goes up on the board. No one is made full time before it being offered to anyone else who is more senior

clashcityrocker · Post by **clashcityrocker** » 15 Jan 2018, 14:00

Unless the duty has an element of skilled work in it (bookroom ex PHG whatever) it should be allocated according to seniority.

Post by **bigal383** » 15 Jan 2018, 14:26

So what happened to in the aggrement done 4 yeard ago hours worked to be reviewed evrry 6 months and you would get those hours worked. Not based on senority. This seems to be a very blsck.and white area

Chitchat · Post by **Chitchat** » 15 Jan 2018, 15:09

bigal383 wrote:So what happened to in the aggrement done 4 yeard ago hours worked to be reviewed evrry 6 months and you would get those hours worked. Not based on senority. This seems to be a very blsck.and white area

By that person working full-time hours for six months and hours that will count. Proves there's a position for a full time job. But it won't necessarily be given to the person working the full time hours it will be offered to the most senior part timer.