If it's a no vote.........
Does that discredit the negotiatiors? If so what does that lead to? Do they stand down?
Does it discredit the Exec? what then? Do these stand down?
Could this lead to confusion and no control at the top? Is it the end of the union?
On the CWU website Billy says 'We must also recognise that the agreement gives the Union the opportunity to be at the centre of dealing with change at national and local level'
Is it better to have some kind of influence albeit a bitter pill, than no influence and change steamrollered ?
Confused !
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Confused about consequences
-
packhorsepaul
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:05
- Location: onmyknees
-
G4GYJ
- Posts: 58
- Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 17:42
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
-
ulster postie
- Posts: 503
- Joined: 19 May 2007, 14:10
- Location: N IRELAND
Re: Confused about consequences
VOTE NOpackhorsepaul wrote:If it's a no vote.........
Does that discredit the negotiatiors? If so what does that lead to? Do they stand down?
HOPEFULLY
Does it discredit the Exec? what then? Do these stand down?
HOPEFULLY
Could this lead to confusion and no control at the top? Is it the end of the union?
NO WE ARE THE UNION
On the CWU website Billy says 'We must also recognise that the agreement gives the Union the opportunity to be at the centre of dealing with change at national and local level' YEA RIGHT
Is it better to have some kind of influence albeit a bitter pill, than no influence and change steamrollered ?
COMPLETE SURRENDER
Confused !
opg town walk
-
jemima
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 10:52
- Location: Cantre'r Gwaelod
The Union will do what WE decide. It's ours and our elected representatives will act on the result of the democratic vote. If we vote no, they will negotiate again on our behalf to stop the flexibility and pensions issues being decided without our consent. I don't expect we'll get more money and there are more important things to fight for.
The problem is that RM are sticking to their own agenda despite the "agreement"; they're not waiting for us to vote, they take "executive action" and they tell people that the pensions and flexibility changes are agreed already. That is NOT RIGHT.
There are scheduled elections for Union officers and no doubt there'll be some discussion and changes then.
The problem is that RM are sticking to their own agenda despite the "agreement"; they're not waiting for us to vote, they take "executive action" and they tell people that the pensions and flexibility changes are agreed already. That is NOT RIGHT.
There are scheduled elections for Union officers and no doubt there'll be some discussion and changes then.
-
Glenno
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 13:12
Please read previous postings this is not the first time this argumment has come up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!jemima wrote:The Union will do what WE decide. It's ours and our elected representatives will act on the result of the democratic vote. If we vote no, they will negotiate again on our behalf to stop the flexibility and pensions issues being decided without our consent. I don't expect we'll get more money and there are more important things to fight for.
The problem is that RM are sticking to their own agenda despite the "agreement"; they're not waiting for us to vote, they take "executive action" and they tell people that the pensions and flexibility changes are agreed already. That is NOT RIGHT.
There are scheduled elections for Union officers and no doubt there'll be some discussion and changes then.