Moya must go?

[rambo1]

When a football team get relegated, normally the manager is looking for another job. Now we're out of the ftse100 and into the 250 is Moya going to fall on her sword? My guess is she won't like not being one of six female bosses in the 100 so will be flying over to Easy jet and back into the 100. Just a guess.

[CPTNemoUK]

When a football team get relegated, normally the manager is looking for another job. Now we're out of the ftse100 and into the 250 is Moya going to fall on her sword? My guess is she won't like not being one of six female bosses in the 100 so will be flying over to Easy jet and back into the 100. Just a guess.

She will get a nice bonus more like it

[wacko74]

Moya and the Board have completely failed to move the business forward and challenge the competition with new and innovative products and services, instead they've done little more than act as asset strippers would do with a failed business, whilst rewarding themselves very generous pay and bonus packages.

They've proved they're completely out of their depth, clueless and incompetent.

I've said before, it takes a very special kind of incompetence for a CEO and Board to piss off the employees AND customers AND shareholders of a company.. but Moya and her board have achieved that dubious distinction.

The only thing preventing widespread shareholder revolt (just yet) is the reasonable divi, which will still keep many income investors satisfied, but if that gets reduced then there will be blood!

[TheTrolleyMan]

Ive heard Phillip Green is looking for new staff

[worktotime]

Moya and the Board have completely failed to move the business forward and challenge the competition with new and innovative products and services, instead they've done little more than act as asset strippers would do with a failed business, whilst rewarding themselves very generous pay and bonus packages.

They've proved they're completely out of their depth, clueless and incompetent.

I've said before, it takes a very special kind of incompetence for a CEO and Board to piss off the employees AND customers AND shareholders of a company.. but Moya and her board have achieved that dubious distinction.

The only thing preventing widespread shareholder revolt (just yet) is the reasonable divi, which will still keep many income investors satisfied, but if that gets reduced then there will be blood!

well said

[Darren Bent]

Problem is who can fire her ?

[rubberbond]

Problem is who can fire her ?

The shareholders.

[CPTNemoUK]

Problem is who can fire her ?

The shareholders.

I think 90% of the work force would like to do the honours

[Jpro747]

Problem is who can fire her ?

The shareholders.

I think 90% of the work force would like to do the honours

Well we are shareholders (those who haven't sold), so what are we waiting for

[postslippete]

She's been quite savvy as she already has one foot in another door. CEOs seem to move around different companies with relative ease anyway. I think she has outlived her usefulness

[Lounge Lizard]

Problem is who can fire her ?

The shareholders.

I think 90% of the work force would like to do the honours

Well we are shareholders (those who haven't sold), so what are we waiting for

I might own a few shares, not that I really wanted them, but that doesn't make me think of myself as a shareholder.

[bigal383]

Maybe the union should hold these strikes also to get rid of her as shes f****d canada post up no doubt she wants to cost us all our jobs one way traffic with her incharge get rid!!!

[eastie]

Problem is who can fire her ?

The shareholders.

I think 90% of the work force would like to do the honours

Well we are shareholders (those who haven't sold), so what are we waiting for

We can every year when they get voted in at the AGM but most posties just throw the letter in the bin when asked to vote

[rambo1]

Problem is who can fire her ?

The shareholders.

I think 90% of the work force would like to do the honours

Well we are shareholders (those who haven't sold), so what are we waiting for

I might own a few shares, not that I really wanted them, but that doesn't make me think of myself as a shareholder.

For starters, why didn't you want the shares, btw, you had chance to opt out, and why do you not think of yourself as a shareholder? People on this forum throw the word shareholders around like its a dirty word.

[Lounge Lizard]

Problem is who can fire her ?

The shareholders.

I think 90% of the work force would like to do the honours

Well we are shareholders (those who haven't sold), so what are we waiting for

I might own a few shares, not that I really wanted them, but that doesn't make me think of myself as a shareholder.

For starters, why didn't you want the shares, btw, you had chance to opt out, and why do you not think of yourself as a shareholder? People on this forum throw the word shareholders around like its a dirty word.

For starters I didn't want the shares because I had no interest in being a shareholder.
Maybe I had a chance to opt out but I couldn't be bothered just like I couldn't now be bothered to even open the Courier.
I don't think of myself as a shareholder because I think of shareholders as having some influence in the company which I don't.
People on this forum throw the word shareholders around like its a dirty word because it means f**k all to them.