courier 50 quid letter

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 26 May 2017, 19:56

how typical of the 'rag' to pick a letter from someone applauding Moya as their star £50 letter. the brown nose was praising her for ''highlighting the appalling T&Cs of some of our competitors. obviously he was on about yodel and hermes. it doesn't take a genius to work out they are scumbag employers. I bet however, had the letter highlighted the disgraceful comparison of our terms to theirs, trying to imply that we are on great terms cos theirs are shite, (which is no justification whatsoever) then that letter wouldn't have seen the light of day. talk about biased narcissism.

Post by **ArthurPewty** » 26 May 2017, 20:48

Got to love the courier:

According to the scaremongering courier, trying to panic us into accepting cuts in T's&C's:
Group Profits DOWN 6%

According to the Annual Report to the Stock Exchange:
Reported results:
Group Profits (before Tax) £335M up from £267M = UP 25.5%
Adjusted results:
Group Profits (before Tax) £559M up from £538M = UP 3.9%

Funny that.......

lightningpostman · Post by **lightningpostman** » 26 May 2017, 22:46

ArthurPewty wrote:Got to love the courier:

According to the scaremongering courier, trying to panic us into accepting cuts in T's&C's:
Group Profits DOWN 6%

According to the Annual Report to the Stock Exchange:
Reported results:
Group Profits (before Tax) £335M up from £267M = UP 25.5%
Adjusted results:
Group Profits (before Tax) £559M up from £538M = UP 3.9%

Funny that.......

missinformation and they should be held accountable and possible legally being challenged as there lying to there entire work force

telithowitis · Post by **telithowitis** » 26 May 2017, 23:01

Wonder if the author of the £50 letter works in her office!!!
Just like politicians lies lies and more lies

Post by **wacko74** » 27 May 2017, 06:09

Reminds of me when the annual profits mysteriously dropped to zero in the year we were due to receive our ''colleague share'' payout... then miraculously returned back to normal the following year.

Post by **bustedflush** » 27 May 2017, 09:08

The Courier? They still send that comic out?

I remember back in Nov. 2014 entering the road safety competition in it where they were giving (allegedly) 6 iPads away. The winners, to this day, have never been announced. If anybody has that edition stored in their airing cupboard as emergency bog roll or folded up in the garage to prop their wonky workbench leg up, please feel free to confirm this. Or perhaps Moira won them all?

kingeric · Post by **kingeric** » 27 May 2017, 14:50

daveyeff wrote:how typical of the 'rag' to pick a letter from someone applauding Moya as their star £50 letter. the brown nose was praising her for ''highlighting the appalling T&Cs of some of our competitors. obviously he was on about yodel and hermes. it doesn't take a genius to work out they are scumbag employers. I bet however, had the letter highlighted the disgraceful comparison of our terms to theirs, trying to imply that we are on great terms cos theirs are shite, (which is no justification whatsoever) then that letter wouldn't have seen the light of day. talk about biased narcissism.

That letter isn't real. Any fool can see that.

Just look at the details of the writer. Just says Huddersfield. It's very vague every other letter gives a delivery office or mail centre

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 27 May 2017, 14:56

kingeric wrote:
daveyeff wrote:how typical of the 'rag' to pick a letter from someone applauding Moya as their star £50 letter. the brown nose was praising her for ''highlighting the appalling T&Cs of some of our competitors. obviously he was on about yodel and hermes. it doesn't take a genius to work out they are scumbag employers. I bet however, had the letter highlighted the disgraceful comparison of our terms to theirs, trying to imply that we are on great terms cos theirs are shite, (which is no justification whatsoever) then that letter wouldn't have seen the light of day. talk about biased narcissism.

That letter isn't real. Any fool can see that.

Just look at the details of the writer. Just says Huddersfield. It's very vague every other letter gives a delivery office or mail centre

It wasn't me.

yubin282 · Post by **yubin282** » 27 May 2017, 15:05

wacko74 wrote:Reminds of me when the annual profits mysteriously dropped to zero in the year we were due to receive our ''colleague share'' payout... then miraculously returned back to normal the following year.

remember it well, send her a letter asking for a full explantation

Darren Bent · Post by **Darren Bent** » 27 May 2017, 16:14

Did you get a reply ? or anyone challenge it.

bertieboy · Post by **bertieboy** » 27 May 2017, 18:12

Maybe the euphoria of Huddersfield reaching the play off final, has had a knock on effect, in that, everything in his world is great. If Reading win, I expect he'll be back in the real world, Royal Mail is f****d etc. Instead of a celebratory magnum of champagne, it'll be a brand new pair of magnums

.

Mobey · Post by **Mobey** » 27 May 2017, 18:26

Just look at the details of the writer. Just says Huddersfield. It's very vague every other letter gives a delivery office or mail centre

Well they probably chose this at random.

They can't put Sheffield can they....

Chitchat · Post by **Chitchat** » 27 May 2017, 18:57

I loved the one that gave details of the pension cut. It was for a 50 year old with 30years service already, saying their pension would only be just over a £1000 a year worse off. Little mention of people like me that will see my pension practically halved.

And i also thought the royal mail profits were up 25%

elteleltel · Post by **elteleltel** » 27 May 2017, 21:05

Off topic but looks like Sports Foundation grants are no longer .
Cost saving again

k979aaa · Post by **k979aaa** » 27 May 2017, 22:37

50 quid to the editor then!