ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Local CWU branch to recommend NO vote

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.

would you be swayed by the advice of your branch on which way to vote

Poll ended at 28 Oct 2007, 19:38

yes
28
16%
no
146
84%
 
Total votes: 174

billypants
Posts: 563
Joined: 25 May 2007, 12:11
Location: South East

Local CWU branch to recommend NO vote

Post by billypants »

I have today heard on very good authority that the south east 3 branch of the CWU is very seriously considering recommending to all it's members that they vote against the deal now on offer, this could have a serious impact on the voting so let's encourage them to see it through and for other branches nationwide to follow suit.

Any other branches heard anything on how they will be advising their members ?
Together we stand, divided we fall
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Post by DirtyHarry »

I'll be voting "NO" , whatever my branch recommends. :cool
geopip
Posts: 95
Joined: 19 May 2007, 09:25

Re: Local CWU branch to recommend NO vote

Post by geopip »

billypants wrote:I have today heard on very good authority that the south east 3 branch of the CWU is very seriously considering recommending to all it's members that they vote against the deal now on offer, this could have a serious impact on the voting so let's encourage them to see it through and for other branches nationwide to follow suit.

Any other branches heard anything on how they will be advising their members ?
Do you mean South East No 5 Branch the largest Branch in the Country? Not South East No 3 the richest Branch.

My Branch is also reccomending a no vote!!!!!
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

DirtyHarry wrote:I'll be voting "NO" , whatever my branch recommends. :cool

Same here mate! But, I'm not so daft as to think if my branch recommended a 'Yes' vote, they won't have been leaned on. I've met too many of my branch officials to think they're stooges for Bill and Dave's Excellent Adventure.
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Post by DirtyHarry »

IWW Fellow Worker wrote:
DirtyHarry wrote:I'll be voting "NO" , whatever my branch recommends. :cool

Same here mate! But, I'm not so daft as to think if my branch recommended a 'Yes' vote, they won't have been leaned on. I've met too many of my branch officials to think they're stooges for Bill and Dave's Excellent Adventure.
I know what you mean, mate. I've a feeling a good many branch officials will have been leant on, before our ballot papers drop on the mat.
irishstaff
Posts: 41
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 22:34

Tell the idiots a BIG FAT NO?

Post by irishstaff »

I have to say that you are all lucky to have a Branch to tell you what to say.....the N.Ireland No1 Branch is in dissarray, STILL.... The reason for this Mr Pat O Hara the so-called, put in place Branch Secretery cant be contacted Y after every Thursday he flys home on that day to Liverpool then arrives back into Belfast the following Tuesday.....but dont worried because the Real Reps who still have fight in the bellies have told the memebership to vote No on this madness of a pay deal. If we accept this document this UNION is finished...... Mark my words....with the work of all the activsts and trade unionist on this site we are the UNION never forget this .............lets get busy and spead the word tell are people to vote NO. Let us lead the way instead of the overpaid leaders of this union.
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Irishstaff...

Post by L Tommo »

Mate you lot being shafted from the HQ MIGHT have a benefit??? It will make many of the waverers vote a BIG NO!!!!

Well i would vote no For the reasons of the deal in place but i would also vote NO because of the way HQ AND PEC have treated you NI boys n girls.... FECKING MURDER..... :lfo :cfo Its a crime...



OUT :speak to the hand :so there :no no :crazy:

NO :wave
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
elmo
Posts: 19
Joined: 26 Feb 2007, 23:43
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Irishstaff...

Post by elmo »

L Tommo wrote:Mate you lot being shafted from the HQ MIGHT have a benefit??? It will make many of the waverers vote a BIG NO!!!!

Well i would vote no For the reasons of the deal in place but i would also vote NO because of the way HQ AND PEC have treated you NI boys n girls.... FECKING MURDER..... :lfo :cfo Its a crime...



OUT :speak to the hand :so there :no no :crazy:

NO :wave
L Tommo, as Amy Winehouse sort of said, they want to me to say yes I say no, no,no
zaphod
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 139
Joined: 29 Aug 2007, 00:49
Gender: Male
Location: Slavesville.

Post by zaphod »

I'll be voting against, too, for many reasons.
Primarily, no matter what the substance of the deal is, how can you vote on something which both sides are interpreting differently?

The deal itself is worse than what we were offered three weeks ago.
Semi-retired, former long-serving CWU Health and Safety Representative
postman43
Posts: 87
Joined: 04 Jul 2007, 19:19

Post by postman43 »

Vote NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO .
Bulldog
Posts: 11
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 16:55

Post by Bulldog »

I have my own mind and will vote my own way and that is a no!!
leelatic
Posts: 108
Joined: 20 May 2007, 20:55

Post by leelatic »

If my branch recommends we vote yes they will lose all credibility in my eyes.
tenpole tudorsack
Posts: 227
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 15:36
Location: A TRUE YORKIE

Post by tenpole tudorsack »

IT'S EASY TO VOTE, LIKE BEING THROWN OFF A CLIFF.... NOOOOOOOO!!! :dance :dance :dance :dance
meweavy
Posts: 473
Joined: 10 May 2007, 11:07

Post by meweavy »

im gonna vote no,but unfortunately i think those that do vote no will be the minority here.

there are 130,000 staff and i bet a lot of those wont even bother reading the deal,they will look at£175 being waved in front of thier faces and the fact we will get our early saturdays back and will vote it in..which is upsetting seeing as all thestrikes would have been in vain,if the deal goes through..

its the same deal as before just worded different..and also those waverers who will probably be too scared to go on strike over xmas aswell..

its going to be voted in....by those to blind to see the s**t..
tenpole tudorsack
Posts: 227
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 15:36
Location: A TRUE YORKIE

Post by tenpole tudorsack »

meweavy wrote:im gonna vote no,but unfortunately i think those that do vote no will be the minority here.

there are 130,000 staff and i bet a lot of those wont even bother reading the deal,they will look at£175 being waved in front of thier faces and the fact we will get our early saturdays back and will vote it in..which is upsetting seeing as all thestrikes would have been in vain,if the deal goes through..

its the same deal as before just worded different..and also those waverers who will probably be too scared to go on strike over xmas aswell..

its going to be voted in....by those to blind to see the s**t..
YOU COULD BE RIGHT BUT IT WON'T STOP ME CAMPAIGNING AND EDUCATING PEOPLE OF THE "REAL" DEAL GOING DOWN HERE. :nana :nana :nana
IT'S LIKE FALLING OFF A CLIFF...JUST SAY "NOoooooooo"