How much, if any, discretion do managers have in issuing sickness stage 1 and 2 ?
Or is it a case of the stages are automatically triggered and managers have no say in their implementation ?
Is there any room for mitigating circumstances ?
Thanks in advance.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Managers discretion
-
jetblack
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 12:54
- Gender: Male
Managers discretion
Good security means trying to limit the damage a Trusted role can do
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Managers discretion
In theory yes, the attendance procedure allows management to take mitigation into account and gives them the discretion to dismiss the stage review.
In practice unless you have a potentially fatal condition, a bloody good rep, the area rep on speakerphone, two sharp lawyers sitting next to you and some incriminating pictures of the manager, a pig and some class A drugs it's pretty much a formality.
In practice unless you have a potentially fatal condition, a bloody good rep, the area rep on speakerphone, two sharp lawyers sitting next to you and some incriminating pictures of the manager, a pig and some class A drugs it's pretty much a formality.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Duran
- Posts: 145
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 11:43
- Gender: Male
Managers discretion
The new attendance procedure, probably makes it better to actually receive a prompt 1 warning. As your only on it for 6 months then you have a clean slate. If you are not issued a prompt one. The next absense you have if you havent cleared your 13 days and 3 absenses in a 12 month period will re trigger, and will definately be issued. Unless as already been stated. You die or your in a coma.
-
jetblack
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 12:54
- Gender: Male
Managers discretion
Thanks FT.
Good to know.
An additional question - would there be any grounds whereby the issuing of a stage is in contravention of the Equality Act 2010 ? Presumably there is, but it must be something covered by the act. Suppose I'll have to go read it
edit. thanks Duran, interesting.
Good to know.
An additional question - would there be any grounds whereby the issuing of a stage is in contravention of the Equality Act 2010 ? Presumably there is, but it must be something covered by the act. Suppose I'll have to go read it
edit. thanks Duran, interesting.
Good security means trying to limit the damage a Trusted role can do
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Managers discretion
The person you refer to as your manager has absolutely no authority to do anything in a DO.jetblack wrote:How much, if any, discretion do managers have in issuing sickness stage 1 and 2 ?
They no longer manage in any meaningful way.
They have to refer all decisions for everything to a higher authority.
If your DOM wants to break wind they have to ask permission.
It also means your unit rep is now probably inconsequential. (Sorry to all unit reps)
The union official who interacts with your manager's manager is now more important.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
Gazza47
- Posts: 32
- Joined: 07 Mar 2017, 09:17
- Gender: Male
Managers discretion
jetblack wrote:Thanks FT.
Good to know.
An additional question - would there be any grounds whereby the issuing of a stage is in contravention of the Equality Act 2010 ? Presumably there is, but it must be something covered by the act. Suppose I'll have to go read it![]()
edit. thanks Duran, interesting.
Think it all depends what you off sick with, I mean if your absence is down to a disability related illness it would be in contravention of equality act and DDA, but if your seventh cold in a month obviously no.
-
plaguelift
- Posts: 133
- Joined: 19 Apr 2011, 06:16
- Gender: Male
Managers discretion
fishtank wrote:In theory yes, the attendance procedure allows management to take mitigation into account and gives them the discretion to dismiss the stage review.
In practice unless you have a potentially fatal condition, a bloody good rep, the area rep on speakerphone, two sharp lawyers sitting next to you and some incriminating pictures of the manager, a pig and some class A drugs it's pretty much a formality.
100% true fishtank.
-
FinishOnTime
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 25 Apr 2013, 16:37
- Gender: Male
Managers discretion
In my experience this isn't true. A unit rep who is up for a fight, will put disagreements in when required and generally argue a decent case for their members is far more valuable than some area or divisional rep sat on their fat arse maybe 100 miles away.clashcityrocker wrote:The person you refer to as your manager has absolutely no authority to do anything in a DO.jetblack wrote:How much, if any, discretion do managers have in issuing sickness stage 1 and 2 ?
They no longer manage in any meaningful way.
They have to refer all decisions for everything to a higher authority.
If your DOM wants to break wind they have to ask permission.
It also means your unit rep is now probably inconsequential. (Sorry to all unit reps)
The union official who interacts with your manager's manager is now more important.
If a DSM/Delivery director know it's going to be a pain to try to get some pie in the sky savings into an office because of an awkward rep, they will generally go elsewhere. The old law of path of least resistance.