Work to Rule

DocketLefty · Post by **DocketLefty** » 19 Jun 2016, 19:41

The amount of part-timers doing full-time work is a joke, how has the union let this go on for so long? If all PTers worked to rule for a couple of weeks, we should soon get made up to FT.

rubberbond · Post by **rubberbond** » 19 Jun 2016, 22:06

DocketLefty wrote:The amount of part-timers doing full-time work is a joke, how has the union let this go on for so long? If all PTers worked to rule for a couple of weeks, we should soon get made up to FT.

i
I believe they tried this somewhere in the East Midlands ,didn't take long for management to back down. Not sure where it was though, but remember reading it on here.

doorstepped · Post by **doorstepped** » 20 Jun 2016, 10:40

don't work to rule, work your hours only and do anything asked of you by management within your daily hours.

Jpro747 · Post by **Jpro747** » 20 Jun 2016, 13:10

rubberbond wrote:
DocketLefty wrote:The amount of part-timers doing full-time work is a joke, how has the union let this go on for so long? If all PTers worked to rule for a couple of weeks, we should soon get made up to FT.
i
I believe they tried this somewhere in the East Midlands ,didn't take long for management to back down. Not sure where it was though, but remember reading it on here.

http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... =1&t=69904" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

rubberbond · Post by **rubberbond** » 20 Jun 2016, 18:59

doorstepped wrote:don't work to rule, work your hours only and do anything asked of you by management within your daily hours.

That is work to rule.

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 21 Jun 2016, 17:02

rubberbond wrote:
doorstepped wrote:don't work to rule, work your hours only and do anything asked of you by management within your daily hours.
That is work to rule.

It is when its organised. When its left to the individual it exercising your rights.