LTB 273/16 - Issues with Appeals Managers
No. 273/2016
4 May 2016
Dear Colleagues,
RE: Issues with Appeals Managers
Whilst responding to motion 84 at Postal Conference last week, I gave a commitment to write to branches to gather information on issues you may have had / be having with Appeals Managers.
If within your branch / division / region you have encountered a bad experience with Appeals Managers please provide fact based evidence to the department.
Please provide the following:-
The issue / nature of your complaint.
Documentation as supporting evidence e.g. Appeal Decision, letters, emails etc
A write up explaining what you believe was wrong.
Whether or not the appeal is going / went to an Employment Tribunal and the current status of the case.
The evidence should be sent to djeffery@cwu.org or Dawn Jeffery at CWU Headquarters address.
Please provide the information by no later than Tuesday 31st May 2016. We will collate all responses received by this date and make the necessary arrangements to meet and discuss with the appropriate managers within Royal Mail.
We will keep branches updated on progress as appropriate.
All enquiries regarding the content of this LTB should be addressed to the PTCS Department, djeffery@cwu.org quoting reference 432.
Yours Sincerely,
Carl Maden.
Acting Assistant Secretary
PTCS Department
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 273/16 - Issues with Appeals Managers
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72658
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
LTB 273/16 - Issues with Appeals Managers
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
General Mannerheim
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:10
- Gender: Male
- Location: Stalag 17
LTB 273/16 - Issues with Appeals Managers
LOL. 
Royal Mail managers.....about as popular as a t.urd in a swimming pool!
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
LTB 273/16 - Issues with Appeals Managers
Dave Mitchell's went to Employment Tribunal.....no joy there.
-
Justiceseeker
- Posts: 65
- Joined: 30 Sep 2015, 19:02
- Gender: Female
LTB 273/16 - Issues with Appeals Managers
I guess the CWU may have brought about this investigation because of the Dave Mitchell case?
Dave's case was a complete mess long before it even reached the appeal manager, but the fact it went the whole way to employment tribunal (simply jaw dropping to listen to and sit through) and for Dave to become one of the 1% who win resinstatement but then have to endure what RM is now doing is criminal in itself. It is this action that should be looked at and the whole mismanaged structure.
Dave's case was a complete mess long before it even reached the appeal manager, but the fact it went the whole way to employment tribunal (simply jaw dropping to listen to and sit through) and for Dave to become one of the 1% who win resinstatement but then have to endure what RM is now doing is criminal in itself. It is this action that should be looked at and the whole mismanaged structure.