ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Mezza
Posts: 405
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 21:56
Location: West London

Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by Mezza »

We have 3 members of staff on light duties at the moment. Of which at least 2 expect to be taken off delivery duties permanently due to their ongoing medical conditions.

I fully understand and accept that RM will seek to find a duty that can accommodate their conditions, but can they for example bump a regular indoor duty(we only have 3) holder , who has no ongoing medical condition or concerns,off their duty?

Also, if they can, does that then have a knock on effect in terms of the now spare OPG bumping someone off their walk and on and on?
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by daveyeff »

no not supposed to, unless a duty has been specifically ringfenced. but even then, there are conditions. you seen the rep?
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12185
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

How far away is the DO from its local MC?
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by motherhubbard »

daveyeff wrote:no not supposed to, unless a duty has been specifically ringfenced. but even then, there are conditions. you seen the rep?
If someone was in a car accident and left with a disability, how could any duty have been ringfenced for them in advance?
RM has a legal responsibility to try and provide work for anyone with a disability and if that means an able bodied colleague losing their duty so be it.
They have the choice of vacant duties until a resign.
Which would most people prefer - the mild inconvenience of having to do a duty they are trained for until they can pick one more to their choosing or a lifetime living with a disability?
Some people need to understand when they are well off and stop whinging.
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
Mezza
Posts: 405
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 21:56
Location: West London

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by Mezza »

Let's get it straight nobody is whinging. I just want to know the correct procedure.
Our nearest MC is about 4 miles away.
Our rep really couldn't care less about the current duty holders or those that have medical conditions.
It's been nearly 3 years since our revision and still no resign despite 100% of duties affected. Rep and his mates came out with decent duties. Rep still uses a bike ffs,puts it in the back of the shared van.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32794
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by POSTMAN »

Best to contact area/HQ for the correct procedure.
Something tells me it's not just a case of 'nicking that duty' ect.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Mezza
Posts: 405
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 21:56
Location: West London

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by Mezza »

I really don't think it's a case of nicking a duty.

The people concerned haven't even expressed an interest at the option or possibility of an indoor duty at our DO.
One of the people concerned says he will probably end up at the MC.

I just wanted to know what the correct procedure would be - would an indoor duty at the existing duty holders DO be considered before the local MC ?

Then obviously what happens to the old duty holder.

Nothing even mentioned about this all as yet, but as one of just the 3 indoor duty holders it would be nice to know how we stand as i've never known how it works, despite being in RM for nearly 17 years.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12185
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Are the Caller's Office and the locker the only two full time permanent indoor duties in your office? How many duties between the two?
Mezza
Posts: 405
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 21:56
Location: West London

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by Mezza »

There's 3 indoor full time duties, role, c Allerston and dom support
bogstandard
Posts: 1074
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by bogstandard »

no duty holder can be made to vacate their duty because it meets the needs of someone with a disability that would be positive discrimination.
It is the business resposibility to make a reasonable adjustment, not potentially a duty holder who has, a duty that meets the needs/requirements of someone who in the opinion of OH the equality act is likely to apply.
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by motherhubbard »

bogstandard wrote:no duty holder can be made to vacate their duty .
How exactly is it "their" duty? Did they buy it?
Doesn't our contract say something about working as directed?
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
Bahia Feliz
Posts: 1169
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 21:04
Gender: Male

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by Bahia Feliz »

motherhubbard wrote: How exactly is it "their" duty? Did they buy it?
They would have signed for it in an official resign or vacant duty notice i reckon!
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12185
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

bogstandard wrote:no duty holder can be made to vacate their duty because it meets the needs of someone with a disability that would be positive discrimination.
It is the business resposibility to make a reasonable adjustment, not potentially a duty holder who has, a duty that meets the needs/requirements of someone who in the opinion of OH the equality act is likely to apply.
Realistically the three of them will probably be sent to the local MC
bogstandard
Posts: 1074
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by bogstandard »

motherhubbard wrote:
bogstandard wrote:no duty holder can be made to vacate their duty .
How exactly is it "their" duty? Did they buy it?
Doesn't our contract say something about working as directed?
if they are the holder of a duty it is their duty, if you are the holder of a duty it is your duty, if we are duty holders they are our duties. This is applicable until such times as a full office resign or duty revision.
You are quite right we are sometimes instructed to work as directed, however your 318 (this is a description of what you do and when you are likely to do it) is what you look at when signing for a duty (making this your duty) to give you an idea of what you will most likely be doing on a day to day basis.
As for purchasing it i couldn't possibly comment on your office as i dont work there.
If you wanted to instigate the as directed bit you would most likley attend for work and wait to be told what to do for every second of evey minute of every hour of your working day. If this is something that interests you speak to your local rep.
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
Bahia Feliz
Posts: 1169
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 21:04
Gender: Male

Re: Bumping duty holder off because of disability ?

Post by Bahia Feliz »

bogstandard wrote: If this is something that interests you speak to your local rep.
:nana