ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
yellowbelly
Posts: 3725
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
Gender: Male

Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by yellowbelly »

Two dumb questions from a newbie about stamps on letters/packets:

1. Why do 'proper' stamps on bulky/irregular shaped parcels seem to escape being cancelled quite often - is it due to it having to be
done manually and they just slip through?

and this one from my daughter (she thinks that now I've been a postie for fewer days than
I've got fingers that I'm suddenly an expert!):

2. What would happen to a letter if you put the stamp on the top left hand corner not the right?

Cheers

YB
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32794
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by POSTMAN »

1:Cause the MC'ers have a lot of breaks.

2:Wouldn't matter because of 1.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by aiden01 »

POSTMAN wrote:1:Cause the MC'ers have a lot of breaks.

2:Wouldn't matter because of 1.
lol maybe if they employed some staff it would be cheaper rather than lose god knows how much through people re.using their stamps :crazy: :crazy:
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12189
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by SpacePhoenix »

aiden01 wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:1:Cause the MC'ers have a lot of breaks.

2:Wouldn't matter because of 1.
lol maybe if they employed some staff it would be cheaper rather than lose god knows how much through people re.using their stamps :crazy: :crazy:
Probably most MCs round the country have axed most if not all of their stamp cancelling staff
Tman
Posts: 4145
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by Tman »

2. Nothing much, other than your letter would go into the reject stream along with the RTS's, Freepost, etc which are then manually checked/franked (delaying it further) and the sender is marked down as either yet another tw*t trying to be funny, or worse, some sort of Care in the Community special needs type of person...
bustedflush
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1493
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 11:19
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by bustedflush »

Tman wrote:2. Nothing much, other than your letter would go into the reject stream along with the RTS's, Freepost, etc which are then manually checked/franked (delaying it further) and the sender is marked down as either yet another tw*t trying to be funny, or worse, some sort of Care in the Community special needs type of person...

:Very Happy :Very Happy :Very Happy :Very Happy :Very Happy
Decky Boy
Posts: 440
Joined: 22 May 2009, 10:00
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by Decky Boy »

With the introduction of security features on stamps (small ovals that are meant to prevent re-use) many mail centres now (it would seem) feel there is no need to cancel or obliterate postage stamps. This may save a bit of money on staffing in Mail Centres...but 'm thinking it must be a false economy as many walking posties still don't cancel stamps before delivery (usually as we don't have the time :sad: ) I make a concerted effort with the new hand stampers recently issued to us but often miss a few... and I can't constantly be cancelling stamps on loops my partner has prepped ? ? ?

I have been told that regular "e-bayers" no longer bother trying to remove uncancelled stamps from jiffy bags and boxes as a quality sticky label over the old name and address works just a treat :arrrghhh Let's start cancelling all stamps ... revenue protection is a major issue... and we really must keep on top of things...
NewPostieUK
Posts: 2104
Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 21:38
Gender: Male
Location: SickAsAChipLand

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by NewPostieUK »

Decky Boy wrote: I make a concerted effort with the new hand stampers recently issued to us
Do you really stand on peoples doorsteps and get out your stamper?
pauljacks
Posts: 8
Joined: 16 Nov 2014, 18:48
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by pauljacks »

Tman wrote:2. Nothing much, other than your letter would go into the reject stream along with the RTS's, Freepost, etc which are then manually checked/franked (delaying it further) and the sender is marked down as either yet another tw*t trying to be funny, or worse, some sort of Care in the Community special needs type of person...
Why is it worse if its a "Care in the Community special needs type of person" ?
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by aiden01 »

pauljacks wrote:
Tman wrote:2. Nothing much, other than your letter would go into the reject stream along with the RTS's, Freepost, etc which are then manually checked/franked (delaying it further) and the sender is marked down as either yet another tw*t trying to be funny, or worse, some sort of Care in the Community special needs type of person...
Why is it worse if its a "Care in the Community special needs type of person" ?
agree why???
Jpro747
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Dec 2012, 10:22
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by Jpro747 »

I still cancel stamps when I notice during prep, but I don't think many of my colleagues bother. :sad:
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by aiden01 »

bustedflush wrote:
Tman wrote:2. Nothing much, other than your letter would go into the reject stream along with the RTS's, Freepost, etc which are then manually checked/franked (delaying it further) and the sender is marked down as either yet another tw*t trying to be funny, or worse, some sort of Care in the Community special needs type of person...

:Very Happy :Very Happy :Very Happy :Very Happy :Very Happy
why are you so happy at this quote :
Tman
Posts: 4145
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by Tman »

Why are you looking so deeply into an off-the-cuff remark? Is it that important or significant?
korky
Posts: 797
Joined: 30 Dec 2007, 09:28

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by korky »

when i saw the video of the new stampers, how do they know how many 1000's of £'s are lost?
all guess work unlike our daily workload which 100% accurate :left:
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Dumb questions about stamps on letters/packets

Post by aiden01 »

Tman wrote:Why are you looking so deeply into an off-the-cuff remark? Is it that important or significant?
very significant when someone very close to me could be very upset by your so called off the cuff remark.also think it is a very crude remark to make then again we all treat comments differently wheter right or wrong.