ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

this job sucks

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
world class male
Posts: 903
Joined: 03 Jul 2013, 15:29
Gender: Male

this job sucks

Post by world class male »

unfortunately there's nothing much better going.
had a decent 10 year roller coaster with many battles won & lost.
a new manager with people skills i can only put on par with thatcher/hitler & a union rep like homer simpson
our days are numbered
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by rubberbond »

world class male wrote:unfortunately there's nothing much better going.
had a decent 10 year roller coaster with many battles won & lost.
a new manager with people skills i can only put on par with thatcher/hitler & a union rep like homer simpson
our days are numbered
Hitler was nice to his mum,by all accounts.
tansorboy
Posts: 355
Joined: 22 Jan 2012, 12:41
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by tansorboy »

world class male wrote:unfortunately there's nothing much better going.
had a decent 10 year roller coaster with many battles won & lost.
a new manager with people skills i can only put on par with thatcher/hitler & a union rep like homer simpson
our days are numbered
The job is good, but you are right - manager and rep are one and the same thing in my place and both seem hell bent on wrecking your day!
I am going to grin and bear it for another couple of years.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: this job sucks

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

rubberbond wrote:
world class male wrote:unfortunately there's nothing much better going.
had a decent 10 year roller coaster with many battles won & lost.
a new manager with people skills i can only put on par with thatcher/hitler & a union rep like homer simpson
our days are numbered
Hitler was nice to his mum,by all accounts.

Indeed he was the one that broke it to her that she had Breast Cancer, and he moved back home to support her till her death. :shock:
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by rubberbond »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
rubberbond wrote:
world class male wrote:unfortunately there's nothing much better going.
had a decent 10 year roller coaster with many battles won & lost.
a new manager with people skills i can only put on par with thatcher/hitler & a union rep like homer simpson
our days are numbered
Hitler was nice to his mum,by all accounts.

Indeed he was the one that broke it to her that she had Breast Cancer, and he moved back home to support her till her death. :shock:
So it's not all bad now,is it? There's hope for Royal Mail management yet,slim hope,but hope nonetheless. I remain an eternal optimist. However,an optimist,is a pessimist,without full recourse to the facts.
PHARRY
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 327
Joined: 04 Nov 2013, 17:56
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by PHARRY »

world class male wrote:unfortunately there's nothing much better going.
had a decent 10 year roller coaster with many battles won & lost.
a new manager with people skills i can only put on par with thatcher/hitler & a union rep like homer simpson
our days are numbered

Not thatcher don't you mean Blair & Brown ?
Lincox
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3485
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by Lincox »

Blair & Brown had a modicum of compassion. Thatcher had zero. Ask the crew of the Belgrano
nickinoneck
Posts: 110
Joined: 20 Aug 2010, 15:37
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by nickinoneck »

Lincox wrote:Blair & Brown had a modicum of compassion. Thatcher had zero. Ask the crew of the Belgrano

Are you comparing this job to a war scenario?!! If you are take yourself to one side and have a word with yourself.
hazzeem025
Posts: 280
Joined: 11 Oct 2009, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by hazzeem025 »

Tony Blair was so compassionate that he lied and Invaded Iraq causing god knows how many deaths and the continuing unrest that we see in the Middle East at present.
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by rubberbond »

Lincox wrote:Blair & Brown had a modicum of compassion. Thatcher had zero. Ask the crew of the Belgrano
As usual,a fatuous statement made with no supporting evidence . On both accounts.
Lincox
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3485
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by Lincox »

The facts are that prior to the Falklands being invaded, Thatcher removed the naval protection which had been consistently covering the Falklands Islanders from such an event. Had that protection been kept in place there would have been no invasion and no Falklands war. She took the credit for a problem her and her government created. As for the Iraq War, Tony Blair received major support from the Tory Party in the decisions that he took. It is fair to say that those decisions have since been acknowledged to be wrong, but it did remove a tyrant who had murdered far more of his own people than the number killed during the Iraq War.
halfull
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 858
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by halfull »

rubberbond wrote:
Lincox wrote:Blair & Brown had a modicum of compassion. Thatcher had zero. Ask the crew of the Belgrano
As usual,a fatuous statement made with no supporting evidence . On both accounts.
:thumbup
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: this job sucks

Post by Lounge Lizard »

Lincox wrote:The facts are that prior to the Falklands being invaded, Thatcher removed the naval protection which had been consistently covering the Falklands Islanders from such an event. Had that protection been kept in place there would have been no invasion and no Falklands war. She took the credit for a problem her and her government created. As for the Iraq War, Tony Blair received major support from the Tory Party in the decisions that he took. It is fair to say that those decisions have since been acknowledged to be wrong, but it did remove a tyrant who had murdered far more of his own people than the number killed during the Iraq War.
Tony Blair did remove a tyrant who, within a couple of years, would have more legitimately have been removed by the Iraqis themselves. :arrrghhh
NWpostie
Posts: 3620
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

Re: this job sucks

Post by NWpostie »

halfull wrote:
rubberbond wrote:
Lincox wrote:Blair & Brown had a modicum of compassion. Thatcher had zero. Ask the crew of the Belgrano
As usual,a fatuous statement made with no supporting evidence . On both accounts.
:thumbup
The Belgrano is a totally justifiable sinking from a Military perspective, warnings have already been given that any enemy ships sailing in the high seas outside the exclusion zone is fair game.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: this job sucks

Post by fishtank »

This tribal bollocks you guys get up to is laughable.
Thatcher/Blair, who cares?, they certainly didn't but while you guys bicker over who was the worst someone else is dipping your pockets.

The Belgrano sinking was a propaganda deal, nothing to do with military necessity, It was a slow old tub, our subs could have tailed it all day long without breaking sweat and if it had come anywhere near our ships they could have opened it up easier than a tin of beans and sent it to the bottom.

All's fair in love and war I suppose and I don't particularly feel it's any more barbaric than any other act of pointless "see who can piss the highest" war-mongering but let's not pretend it was a "necessity" or any more justifiable than the Argies fireboming the Welsh Guards before they could even get off the ship in San Carlos, It was all in most respects completely unnecessary killing of fellow peeps.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share