ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

The cwu should promotr this site!!

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
weetrogg
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 239
Joined: 07 Oct 2007, 13:36

The cwu should promotr this site!!

Post by weetrogg »

The CWU should pay for flyers to promote this site, without trying to have any influence in its running or content :nana :nana :nana
taxi4leighton
Posts: 343
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 14:05

Post by taxi4leighton »

union website had its own message room but closed it

down
bri
Posts: 23
Joined: 04 Oct 2007, 21:00

Post by bri »

taxi4leighton wrote:union website had its own message room but closed it

down
Do you know why?
rollingthunder
Posts: 55
Joined: 25 Jul 2007, 19:06

Post by rollingthunder »

bri wrote:
taxi4leighton wrote:union website had its own message room but closed it

down
Do you know why?
Probably getting too much stick.Just a guess. :nana :nana :nana :nana
The meek ain`t gonna inherit s**t.
dave7634
Posts: 289
Joined: 08 Jun 2007, 08:54

Post by dave7634 »

bri wrote:
taxi4leighton wrote:union website had its own message room but closed it

down
Do you know why?
I would imagine that, from a legal point of view, that if a postie slagged off someone then the union itself could be found liable for it given that it supplied the forum with which to air the view in the first place. Have you heard the news of late where a guy slagged off a football manager of a club on their own forum and they're now taking him and the forum owner to court. IP addresses can be tracked and traced.
borderscot
Posts: 87
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 12:35

Post by borderscot »

All it would take is a downloadable flyer which reps could place up on their notice board :cfo
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Post by dvbuk55 »

bri wrote:
taxi4leighton wrote:union website had its own message room but closed it

down
Do you know why?
Well it coincided with union elections and I imagine there was a feeling that there may undue influence exerted. There was and generally is certain criticism about union officers justified or not. As I recall there was a bit of a furore over certain pension payments made but I don't remember who for. I think they are afraid of offices communicating information freely - and for the communication union that in itself is a failing.

They seem to want to stand aside from the nitty gritty a bit like the detail for the flexible working - and as we all know the devil is in the detail.
ewen1956
Posts: 59
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 11:18

Re: The cwu should promotr this site!!

Post by ewen1956 »

weetrogg wrote:The CWU should pay for flyers to promote this site, without trying to have any influence in its running or content :nana :nana :nana
Here! Here! surely with the increase in subs planned for early 2008, they would manage that as an obligement at least!