ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Bicycles V Vans

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Gold Fox
Posts: 313
Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 20:50
Gender: Female

Bicycles V Vans

Post by Gold Fox »

Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
halfull
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 858
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by halfull »

Gold Fox wrote:Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
bikes are useless with the packets we get these days.
P13
Posts: 1016
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 14:35
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by P13 »

The vast majority of OPG's have never used bikes
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by rubberbond »

Gold Fox wrote:Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
I have no idea ,whether or not they are financially better off,as for your other points,how can it be illegal? Unless you mean contrary to,the conduct code,so beloved of our management.
NWpostie
Posts: 3620
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by NWpostie »

There is the logic in using vans as packets are the future, in certain areas HCT or large capacity cycles might be more appropriate if there is nowhere to park up in a van. It could have been managed better, intimidation and bullying to enforce targets would only be counter productive, vans are not the problem, its local managements in some areas.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
Altrider
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 81
Joined: 12 Feb 2013, 17:29
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by Altrider »

Do they still have dynamo powered lights on bikes? If so can you charge a PDA whilst pedalling? :whistle
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by Brain Fury »

Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
Tuffers1875
Posts: 146
Joined: 14 Nov 2012, 15:27
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by Tuffers1875 »

Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
In your opinion or fact?
Nigel1505
Posts: 409
Joined: 10 Jun 2010, 08:24
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by Nigel1505 »

Altrider wrote:Do they still have dynamo powered lights on bikes? If so can you charge a PDA whilst pedalling? :whistle


Nice one. :wave
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by dvbuk55 »

Tuffers1875 wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
In your opinion or fact?
It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.
bustedflush
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1493
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 11:19
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by bustedflush »

Gold Fox wrote:Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?

Scraping a push bike would hardly be noticed, but scraping your van would likely be investigated by a manager.
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by rubberbond »

dvbuk55 wrote:
Tuffers1875 wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
In your opinion or fact?
It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.
I was told they were sent to Africa,haven't they suffered enough?
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by dvbuk55 »

rubberbond wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
Tuffers1875 wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
In your opinion or fact?
It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.
I was told they were sent to Africa,haven't they suffered enough?
I did send a number to Africa via Swindon and they had to be serviced and repaired to UK standards prior to despatch but I think later on there was a separate disposal instruction but by then we hadn't any. The last 7 went to another office before their modernisation which was delayed for a couple of years because they were having a new office built.
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by Lounge Lizard »

dvbuk55 wrote:
Tuffers1875 wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
In your opinion or fact?
It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.
But it still happens, RM bikes used just for travelling to and from work. :shock:
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Bicycles V Vans

Post by Brain Fury »

Lounge Lizard wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
Tuffers1875 wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
In your opinion or fact?
It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.
But it still happens, RM bikes used just for travelling to and from work. :shock:
I don't doubt it just as I am sure that there are bikes hidden away for use on delivery. That doesn't change the fact that as dvbuk55 says they shouldn't be. The remaining bikes should be removed over the next few months so it will be obvious that any left after that shouldn't be there.

Most bikes are sent to Africa via The Krizevac Project charity. They are extremely grateful for them.