ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Bicycles V Vans
-
Gold Fox
- Posts: 313
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 20:50
- Gender: Female
Bicycles V Vans
Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
-
halfull
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 858
- Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
bikes are useless with the packets we get these days.Gold Fox wrote:Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
-
P13
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 14:35
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
The vast majority of OPG's have never used bikes
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
I have no idea ,whether or not they are financially better off,as for your other points,how can it be illegal? Unless you mean contrary to,the conduct code,so beloved of our management.Gold Fox wrote:Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
-
NWpostie
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9
Re: Bicycles V Vans
There is the logic in using vans as packets are the future, in certain areas HCT or large capacity cycles might be more appropriate if there is nowhere to park up in a van. It could have been managed better, intimidation and bullying to enforce targets would only be counter productive, vans are not the problem, its local managements in some areas.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
-
Altrider
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 81
- Joined: 12 Feb 2013, 17:29
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
Do they still have dynamo powered lights on bikes? If so can you charge a PDA whilst pedalling? 
-
Brain Fury
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 664
- Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
-
Tuffers1875
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 14 Nov 2012, 15:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
In your opinion or fact?Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
-
Nigel1505
- Posts: 409
- Joined: 10 Jun 2010, 08:24
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
Altrider wrote:Do they still have dynamo powered lights on bikes? If so can you charge a PDA whilst pedalling?
Nice one.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.Tuffers1875 wrote:In your opinion or fact?Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
-
bustedflush
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 11:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
Gold Fox wrote:Is Royal Mail financially better off , using vans and scraping bicycles ?
Is it illegal to ride ex-Royal Mail bike to work and back home ?
Is it illegal to use ex.Royal Mail bike for delivering small amount of mail ( Occasionally ) ?
Scraping a push bike would hardly be noticed, but scraping your van would likely be investigated by a manager.
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
I was told they were sent to Africa,haven't they suffered enough?dvbuk55 wrote:It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.Tuffers1875 wrote:In your opinion or fact?Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
I did send a number to Africa via Swindon and they had to be serviced and repaired to UK standards prior to despatch but I think later on there was a separate disposal instruction but by then we hadn't any. The last 7 went to another office before their modernisation which was delayed for a couple of years because they were having a new office built.rubberbond wrote:I was told they were sent to Africa,haven't they suffered enough?dvbuk55 wrote:It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.Tuffers1875 wrote:In your opinion or fact?Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Bicycles V Vans
But it still happens, RM bikes used just for travelling to and from work.dvbuk55 wrote:It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.Tuffers1875 wrote:In your opinion or fact?Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
-
Brain Fury
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 664
- Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Bicycles V Vans
I don't doubt it just as I am sure that there are bikes hidden away for use on delivery. That doesn't change the fact that as dvbuk55 says they shouldn't be. The remaining bikes should be removed over the next few months so it will be obvious that any left after that shouldn't be there.Lounge Lizard wrote:But it still happens, RM bikes used just for travelling to and from work.dvbuk55 wrote:It's a fact. Unless the cycle is the proscribed method of delivery. If the cycle is no longer a method of delivery for that office then here is no provision for checks, spares and servicing and is definitely not an alternative for getting to and from work. All cycles should have been disposed of after modernisation except in special circumstances. As a mode of transport there are definitely better alternatives from Halfords than the RM cycles but I'm not sure if the cycle to work scheme is still in operation.Tuffers1875 wrote:In your opinion or fact?Brain Fury wrote:Offices should not have kept any bikes for use "just in case" after the revision has been implemented. And they certainly shouldn't be letting you use bikes just for travelling to and from work.
Most bikes are sent to Africa via The Krizevac Project charity. They are extremely grateful for them.