ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

packet count for revision

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
dubdaz
Posts: 264
Joined: 06 Jun 2007, 15:55
Gender: Male
Location: london borough in kent

packet count for revision

Post by dubdaz »

Told a couple of weeks ago we'd have to do a packet count for this week,sheets were put out Monday,orderly queue formed outside the doms office for an explanation of how to fill it out,his reply "I DONT KNOW".Result packet count put off till they find out :arrrghhh
Any married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: packet count for revision

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

When we had it we had

Oversize - PDA
Oversize No PDA

International PDA Non attendance
International PDA Attendance

Tracked Attendance
Tracked Non attendance

Specials/Signed For

Others Attendance
Others Non Attendance

(Now if I was doing it I would make sure that there is also a box for DTN attempts.)
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
NewPostieUK
Posts: 2104
Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 21:38
Gender: Male
Location: SickAsAChipLand

Re: packet count for revision

Post by NewPostieUK »

We had packets, Specials, Tracked and Recorded's. No idea what we did with Internationals, just in the Specials column if they came with the Specials.

The thing I remember is, most people were exaggerating. I was baffled. 'make them think we are doing even more work'. Big mistake. 'You were averaging 65 a day before, now there's just 45 a day, you need more streets added' said the planner.
eastie
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2234
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 15:32
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by eastie »

They must know how many Specials , Recorded's and Tracked items per round as they are on your PDA.
Why not just record how many packet bags of normal parcels you have per day and how many Yorks of large parcels per P/L round pairings.
Only problem is that one week can be so different to the next .
We get absolutely hammered on parcels on the 1st week of the month when everyone gets paid and less so a week before people get paid.
loverman shabba
Posts: 238
Joined: 11 Jul 2013, 15:15
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by loverman shabba »

waste of time. they just fiddle the figures to fit anyway
IloveMYredTROLLEY!
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1923
Joined: 02 Apr 2010, 06:54
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by IloveMYredTROLLEY! »

Do not guess what parcels are attendance calls and which are not before you go out, get an accurate record from how things went on delivery, letterbox sizes vary enormously!

Using number of parcel bags, number of sequenced/manual trays etc. is an awful way to judge a workload... Parcel sizes vary massively, sequenced trays can be anything up to ~400 letters per tray (where it is a mission to remove the first bundle of letters) and manual trays can be anything from paper thin postcards to chunky catalogs.
Last edited by IloveMYredTROLLEY! on 14 Oct 2014, 20:24, edited 1 time in total.
mccoop
Posts: 43
Joined: 21 Apr 2008, 16:19

Re: packet count for revision

Post by mccoop »

Paper exercise.All tracked ,will give them walk ,street and time.Don't bother.
halfull
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 858
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by halfull »

loverman shabba wrote:waste of time. they just fiddle the figures to fit anyway
correct
NewPostieUK
Posts: 2104
Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 21:38
Gender: Male
Location: SickAsAChipLand

Re: packet count for revision

Post by NewPostieUK »

eastie wrote:They must know how many Specials , Recorded's and Tracked items per round as they are on your PDA.
We didn't have PDA's at the time. We (normal, walking, part timers) didn't get them until the revision kicked in.
Hitcher
Posts: 1530
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 09:59
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by Hitcher »

loverman shabba wrote:waste of time. they just fiddle the figures to fit anyway
This.

Happened in our DO when the figures were above the national average so they ignored them.
thehobbit
Posts: 76
Joined: 26 Jun 2014, 12:14
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by thehobbit »

halfull wrote:
loverman shabba wrote:waste of time. they just fiddle the figures to fit anyway
correct
have to agree pegasus said 19 attendance calls per 500 calls they said 28 , we counted 48 ,guess what figures they used . :dance :dance
centenaryman
Posts: 512
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:31
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by centenaryman »

we had a planner who took off 2 of the zeros on the parcel count.......so it looked like the office didn't get many parcels only mail LOL,,,,1st run of the computer and we had massive walks,,,,,when the union got involved they realised the planners error LOL and the walk sizes had to drop
antcpfc
Posts: 629
Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 17:25

Re: packet count for revision

Post by antcpfc »

loverman shabba wrote:waste of time. they just fiddle the figures to fit anyway
Spot on.Two years ago we counted our packets honestly but the planners wouldn't accept the figures.It has been a monumental.Balls up and we had two top bods down this week saying that a new revision is to be done.It seems they are fed up with the overtime being paid.
We won't hold our breath.
Slider tool. Lol.
postslippete
Posts: 4194
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: packet count for revision

Post by postslippete »

Its just managers documenting whatever they are documenting

except you are doing the leg work for them as usual. It goes round in a cycle, next thing its hazard cards, then its weighing all your pouches, then its another different form created for your door-to-doors, then its accidents on delivery posted on the noticeboard.

Its simply a job for managers to do when they are bored or something that makes them look good while you are out doing what it is necessary for the business (and something most of them would rather poke their own eyes first) - delivering...
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
takeyourbreak
Posts: 29
Joined: 10 Oct 2007, 16:16

Re: packet count for revision

Post by takeyourbreak »

We did this in our office several times and each time the results went missing! No use to man or beast these counts