Would you prefer links to shadowy groups like Solidarity or the Trafalgar Club?ndodge4 wrote:why does the union not sever its links with labour and also stop funding shadowy groups like UAF and searchlight etc.
Labour opened up the business and allowed others to cherry pick, and we help tnt, uk mail etc get a foothold in the market, plus, the regulator (no doubt close labour allies) has no sympathy with us.
Fook Labour - :lfo
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
The labour link?
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: The labour link?
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
-
doveston
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 23:32
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7037052.stm
Mr Brown said the dispute "should be brought to an end on the terms that have been offered as soon as possible".
Mr Brown said the dispute "should be brought to an end on the terms that have been offered as soon as possible".
-
PrestwickPostie
- Posts: 208
- Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 12:33
Brown can GTFdoveston wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7037052.stm
Mr Brown said the dispute "should be brought to an end on the terms that have been offered as soon as possible".
Adam Crozier is Peter Mandelson's rent boy
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32757
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Moved to Union Room.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
L Tommo
- Posts: 3165
- Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
- Gender: Male
- Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!
liebour link???? More like LIEBOUR STINK!!!
FECK LIEBOUR AND BILLYS HANDOUTS.... GET BOTH OF EM OUT AND BE QUICK AT IT....
OUT OUT OUT

OUT OUT OUT
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........
EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
-
mailjock
- ROYAL MAIL CUSTOMER SERVICE
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 16:23
Fook Labour?
Well - I've torn up my membership card after Brown's stance at PM Question Time but Fook Labour - well we all know that there's no real alternative for the working class - bad as they might be.
I'm sure the TUC have given Bottler a tongue-lashing for the damage he has done to the LP in the eyes of the whole trade union movement just because - I reckon - a Tory nobody rattled him in Parliament and he couldn't handle it.
For us in the CWU this has become a more personal issue and we must look at the whole question of the political levy and IMHO it cannot be just given as a block grant to Labour but to MPs who support us - but again we shouldn't have a knee-jerk reaction to this because as a trade union we have to try and influence politicians in all sorts of ways and it is daft to throw away any negotiating tools not just now but for the future.
Email your MPs and not just labour ones and spell out the basics of why we are on strike and ask for confirmation of their support and also visible signs of that support by signing Early Day Motions or writing to the local paper or raising it in the Commons.
Let's be active and let's be positive - we are fighting for our future so let's not be distracted by sideshows.
I'm sure the TUC have given Bottler a tongue-lashing for the damage he has done to the LP in the eyes of the whole trade union movement just because - I reckon - a Tory nobody rattled him in Parliament and he couldn't handle it.
For us in the CWU this has become a more personal issue and we must look at the whole question of the political levy and IMHO it cannot be just given as a block grant to Labour but to MPs who support us - but again we shouldn't have a knee-jerk reaction to this because as a trade union we have to try and influence politicians in all sorts of ways and it is daft to throw away any negotiating tools not just now but for the future.
Email your MPs and not just labour ones and spell out the basics of why we are on strike and ask for confirmation of their support and also visible signs of that support by signing Early Day Motions or writing to the local paper or raising it in the Commons.
Let's be active and let's be positive - we are fighting for our future so let's not be distracted by sideshows.
-
mailjock
- ROYAL MAIL CUSTOMER SERVICE
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 16:23
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing
Labour didn't open up the market - EC legislation did.
I reckon if the Tories had been in power during the last 3-5 years that Royal Mail would have been totally privatised by now and we'd all be out the door replaced by a non-unionised part-time cowed workforce. Oh and pension scheme - what pension scheme as that would have been terminated to help sell us off to the Tory Party's pals in big business.
That's why we must use a carrot and stick approach to the political levy and not just spout off without knowing the full facts and working out how best to protect and advance our position and that isn't just for the immediate battle but for the war that lies ahead until we have forced Labour to defend service levels.
I reckon if the Tories had been in power during the last 3-5 years that Royal Mail would have been totally privatised by now and we'd all be out the door replaced by a non-unionised part-time cowed workforce. Oh and pension scheme - what pension scheme as that would have been terminated to help sell us off to the Tory Party's pals in big business.
That's why we must use a carrot and stick approach to the political levy and not just spout off without knowing the full facts and working out how best to protect and advance our position and that isn't just for the immediate battle but for the war that lies ahead until we have forced Labour to defend service levels.
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: The labour link?
I'm for the working class.ndodge4 wrote:quite frankly- yes, im a bnp man through an through, like many boys in my office ,but i believe in the unions, i dont agree with all my partys manifesto, but a damm more than all the rest.
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: The labour link?
I never did like Nazis.ndodge4 wrote:
Terrible signature btw
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: The labour link?
Both my grandads also fought them. Pity they didn't kill a few more of them.ndodge4 wrote:funnily enough ,nor did i, nor my grandad, who fought them, still, facists were italian, nazis were germans, me im a nationalist, thats all.IWW Fellow Worker wrote:I never did like Nazis.ndodge4 wrote:
Terrible signature btw
I'm an internationalist.

The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: The labour link?
I have no comrades who are supporters of bosses political parties.ndodge4 wrote:IWW Fellow Worker wrote:Both my grandads also fought them. Pity they didn't kill a few more of them.ndodge4 wrote:funnily enough ,nor did i, nor my grandad, who fought them, still, facists were italian, nazis were germans, me im a nationalist, thats all.IWW Fellow Worker wrote:I never did like Nazis.ndodge4 wrote:
Terrible signature btw
I'm an internationalist.
we all have our crosses to bear - comrade![]()
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
-
IWW Fellow Worker
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: The labour link?
Not at all. I'm all for fighting the bosses. They're the real enemy.ndodge4 wrote:tetchyIWW Fellow Worker wrote:I have no comrades who are supporters of bosses political parties.ndodge4 wrote:IWW Fellow Worker wrote:Both my grandads also fought them. Pity they didn't kill a few more of them.ndodge4 wrote:funnily enough ,nor did i, nor my grandad, who fought them, still, facists were italian, nazis were germans, me im a nationalist, thats all.IWW Fellow Worker wrote:I never did like Nazis.ndodge4 wrote:
Terrible signature btw
I'm an internationalist.
we all have our crosses to bear - comrade![]()
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
-
anini
- Posts: 67
- Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 07:15
eu legislation may have opened the postal market for competition but thats in 2011.
the question is why did labour open up the market before that date and why havent they done anything to stop cherry-picking from the most lucrative parts of the organisation?
I THINK WE ALL KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.
LOOK WHAT THE LABOUR CRONIES DONE TO THE MILLENIUM DOME
WHATS HAVING TO THE OLYMPICS
AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHATS GONNA HAPPEN TO ROYAL MAIL.
NU LABOUR TALKS ABOUT OPENING UP COMPITITION BUT WHY HAVE THEY ALLOWED TESCO TO TAKE A STRANGLE HOLD ON ALMOST EVERYTHING.[/b]
the question is why did labour open up the market before that date and why havent they done anything to stop cherry-picking from the most lucrative parts of the organisation?
I THINK WE ALL KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.
LOOK WHAT THE LABOUR CRONIES DONE TO THE MILLENIUM DOME
WHATS HAVING TO THE OLYMPICS
AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHATS GONNA HAPPEN TO ROYAL MAIL.
NU LABOUR TALKS ABOUT OPENING UP COMPITITION BUT WHY HAVE THEY ALLOWED TESCO TO TAKE A STRANGLE HOLD ON ALMOST EVERYTHING.[/b]
-
jamie
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 21 Jun 2007, 16:09
As a socialist I have found the militancy of my colleagues totally heartening in a world where workers are being crushed on a daily basis. But I musn't forget that despite their courage and determination, many of them are reactionary; racist, sexist, homophobic and even classist; looking down of those worse off than them.
Strike action is people power, but we still have a long way to go.
Strike action is people power, but we still have a long way to go.
-
Spartacus
- Posts: 533
- Joined: 23 Jun 2007, 16:41
- Location: Wales
jamie wrote:As a socialist I have found the militancy of my colleagues totally heartening in a world where workers are being crushed on a daily basis. But I musn't forget that despite their courage and determination, many of them are reactionary; racist, sexist, homophobic and even classist; looking down of those worse off than them.
Strike action is people power, but we still have a long way to go.
Good post, we still have to challenge reactionary behaviour from our colleagues as well as our managers.
Delivery
Resistance is fertile
Resistance is fertile