ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Labour Divorcing the Unions

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Labour Divorcing the Unions

Post by dvbuk55 »

According to the Sunday papers The Labour party is divorcing the unions and are looking to change the opt out financial support to a more reasonable opt in. It would seem that the children of the old guard are also realising that the unions per se are a spent force in shaping the future in any meaningful way either politically or in the work place. Having now been side lined in effect, what use would union leaders be in purporting to have the ear of ministers et al when really nobody is listening and they are merely tolerated rather than included.
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

Re: Labour Divorcing the Unions

Post by silly suffolk »

perhaps the unions distanced from political parties who don't give a toss about the betterment of working class people is not a bad thing. unfortunately this is what the labour party has become. to think that the labour party was set up as a mouthpiece for the union movement. now it seems to be a club for the political elite to increase their personal hubris.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72713
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Labour Divorcing the Unions

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

this says it all for me over Labour and Conservatives Image

The Lib/Lab/Con Coalition has been in power since 1979 :sad:
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Labour Divorcing the Unions

Post by dvbuk55 »

I'm about to leave the union and re-join the labour party after a number of years absence. I think the party are moving towards listening to the members again and want to be more diverse in recruiting non-union members probably because union membership is in decline and like any organisation requiring financial support they need to chase the cash.
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: Labour Divorcing the Unions

Post by newtimes »

chase the cash
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19581792" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: Labour Divorcing the Unions

Post by arnold cheshire »

dvbuk55 wrote:According to the Sunday papers The Labour party is divorcing the unions and are looking to change the opt out financial support to a more reasonable opt in. It would seem that the children of the old guard are also realising that the unions per se are a spent force in shaping the future in any meaningful way either politically or in the work place. Having now been side lined in effect, what use would union leaders be in purporting to have the ear of ministers et al when really nobody is listening and they are merely tolerated rather than included.
this was mentioned months ago :nana
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Labour Divorcing the Unions

Post by dvbuk55 »

bringon4dayweeks wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:According to the Sunday papers The Labour party is divorcing the unions and are looking to change the opt out financial support to a more reasonable opt in. It would seem that the children of the old guard are also realising that the unions per se are a spent force in shaping the future in any meaningful way either politically or in the work place. Having now been side lined in effect, what use would union leaders be in purporting to have the ear of ministers et al when really nobody is listening and they are merely tolerated rather than included.
this was mentioned months ago :nana
But this isn't a mention it's now policy even with union agreement............though it didn't mention the CWU probably Moya can't make her mind up as to if the CWU are pro or con.................maybe a joint statement to follow?