ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

pay

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
duckso
Posts: 4
Joined: 13 Feb 2014, 14:50
Gender: Male

pay

Post by duckso »

Does anyone know when the £100 payment that was consolidated into the new pay deal is going to be paid? This is a breakdown of £200 we got before christmas and the other £100 that they union asked to be put into the new pay deal as a £1.90 payment a week backdated to april 2013.
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: pay

Post by chrisj »

It has already be consolidated in an improved pay rate for the first year and it will eventually end up being more than £100 by the end of the 3rd year through compounded increased pay rate.

E.g we got 3% pay rise instead of 2.6%; that pay rate (3%) will be further increased by another 3% and so on...

Furthermore, it will definitely be more than £100 for those that do Overtime
duckso
Posts: 4
Joined: 13 Feb 2014, 14:50
Gender: Male

Re: pay

Post by duckso »

We got a 3% pay increase this year 2013, we got 3% for 2014 and 2.8% in 2015, so where is the other 0.6% if we got a 9.4% pay rise?
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: pay

Post by chrisj »

The difference between the old pay offer and the one agreed is that £300 lump sum became £200 and the first year (2013/2014 - this year) increased from 2.6% to 3%.

For the average FT postie on about £20000 that is an increase of about £80 (0.4%) and the rest is compounded. So 3% or (3% * £372) is more than 3% of (2.6% * £372) and so on for the 2.8%. I don't want to dig out my pay slip to use proper figures.

I do not understand this 0.6% you wrote. Perhaps you mean the compounded interest rate which probably includes the supplements as well
Hitcher
Posts: 1523
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 09:59
Gender: Male

Re: pay

Post by Hitcher »

9.06% actually.

100 + 3% = 103
103 + 3% = 106.09
106.09 + 2.8% = 109.06
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: pay

Post by chrisj »

Hitcher wrote:9.06% actually.

100 + 3% = 103 (100 + 100*3%)
103 + 3% = 106.09 (103 + 100*3%)
106.09 + 2.8% = 109.06
(106.09*2.8%)

The compounded figures given by both RM and the CWU (different) must include some of the supplements or something else but certainly not just the basic pay... Perhaps they have added the £200 figure in the overall calculation???
Last edited by chrisj on 27 Feb 2014, 16:12, edited 1 time in total.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16672
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: pay

Post by clashcityrocker »

chrisj wrote:
Hitcher wrote:9.06% actually.

100 + 3% = 103 (100 + 100*3%)
103 + 3% = 106.09 (103 + 100*3%)
106.09 + 2.8% = 109.06
(106.09*3%)

The compounded figures given by both RM and the CWU (different) must include some of the supplements or something else but certainly not just the basic pay... Perhaps they have added the £200 figure in the overall calculation???
I don't know what you are on about.
The 3 year pay deal was 9.06% over 3 years as explained in the post by Hitcher above.
It explains how 3% + 3% + 2.8% = 9.06% when compounded over the 3 years.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: pay

Post by chrisj »

Shooting the messenger, are we?

I know what I am on about and it is explained in my post... (Hitcher is right, of course - I am just showing my working out).

Furthermore, that question should have been addressed to the original poster. Read the second post from the original poster. The compounded figures given in some literature is more than the 9.06%.