ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
stephen500
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1458
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04

Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by stephen500 »

94% say Yes to Royal Mail deal.
Wow what a resounding endorsement of the union's position. Some said it would be close? Even I didn't think it would be carried by this big a margin.
Non-voters have NO right to complain.
It's only an "x" and a trip to the post box or imp.
Yes 61,963 94.5%
No 3,595 5.5%

Legally Binding Pensions Agreement

Yes 62,508 95.5%
No 2,965 4.5%
Andy51
Posts: 91
Joined: 08 Jan 2013, 15:45
Gender: Male

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by Andy51 »

Well the doom and gloom merchants didn't put off the majority I suppose they will be leaving soon
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by newtimes »

Great leadership inspires people, 50% of people didn’t vote. :whistle
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by dvbuk55 »

newtimes wrote:Great leadership inspires people, 50% of people didn’t vote. :whistle
It's a pity there isn't a mandatory vote and those who don't vote are sanctioned - or do I mean sectioned?
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72713
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Andy51 wrote:Well the doom and gloom merchants didn't put off the majority I suppose they will be leaving soon
Why? Or do you prefer unquestioning support to a healthy debate.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by newtimes »

If a decision had to be carried by 51% of all voters then a lot more effort would be made by every one. I accept the Yes vote trashed the No vote, but even if it was the other way round I still would not accept it when there is not a 51% of voters for an outcome. Sure shoot me down, but take the Scottish referendum vote coming up, both yes and no camps want my vote. I have asked both sides for an answer to my question which is: a large % will not vote, add that to the losing side, then the minority wins. Still waiting for an answer. If we live in a society when the growing trend is for people not to vote, a minority can exploit that and promote that culture to gain power. So what I am saying, are people selling ideas to only the majority of the minority of people who actually vote. :hmmmm
frankieboy
Posts: 303
Joined: 12 May 2008, 18:34

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by frankieboy »

stephen500 wrote:94% say Yes to Royal Mail deal.
Wow what a resounding endorsement of the union's position. Some said it would be close? Even I didn't think it would be carried by this big a margin.
Non-voters have NO right to complain.
It's only an "x" and a trip to the post box or imp.
Yes 61,963 94.5%
No 3,595 5. :d'oh! 5%

Legally Binding Pensions Agreement

Yes 62,508 95.5%
No 2,965 4.5%


Totally agree mate and all the yes voters will have no problem in the future when more mail centres are closed or outsourced after 5 years in the the name of profit. :d'oh!
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by doorstepped »

k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by k979aaa »

Andy51 wrote:Well the doom and gloom merchants didn't put off the majority I suppose they will be leaving soon
I say you will pay for this when you start whingeing about your workload or being made redundant I will not pity you for your greed and avarice and conceitedness but expect no sympathy from me up yours!
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by newtimes »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy04c-6DEgE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by Martin Walsh »

New times only 65 % voted in the General Election and 50% in the Scotish parliament elections. Sadly it's the way of life . Thatcher introduced postal ballots for unions cause it would always be a lower turn out then a workplace ballot.

Compared to other unions our returns are very good. Look at the Tessa and RMT ballots for example.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by k979aaa »

dingo wrote:New times only 65 % voted in the General Election and 50% in the Scotish parliament elections. Sadly it's the way of life . Thatcher introduced postal ballots for unions cause it would always be a lower turn out then a workplace ballot.

Compared to other unions our returns are very good. Look at the Tessa and RMT ballots for example.
Not happy with the agreement nothing about bulling and harassment or dealing with cut offs other than that it is ok but what about those two points I gave?
newtimes
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 595
Joined: 16 Feb 2012, 14:10
Gender: Male

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by newtimes »

dingo wrote:New times only 65 % voted in the General Election and 50% in the Scotish parliament elections. Sadly it's the way of life . Thatcher introduced postal ballots for unions cause it would always be a lower turn out then a workplace ballot.

Compared to other unions our returns are very good. Look at the Tessa and RMT ballots for example.
"Sadly it's the way of life" in the past workers did not accept that view and fought for change. I now enjoy a better life than those you fought for change in the past. I have duty to try and follow in their foot steps to give the future generation a better life. Not only are people not voting, many more are not registering to vote, great news for minority groups with funding to get their way.
mlw
Posts: 182
Joined: 12 Sep 2013, 21:32
Gender: Male

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by mlw »

k979aaa wrote:
dingo wrote:New times only 65 % voted in the General Election and 50% in the Scotish parliament elections. Sadly it's the way of life . Thatcher introduced postal ballots for unions cause it would always be a lower turn out then a workplace ballot.

Compared to other unions our returns are very good. Look at the Tessa and RMT ballots for example.
Not happy with the agreement nothing about bulling and harassment or dealing with cut offs other than that it is ok but what about those two points I gave?
And what are the new incentives supposed to be agreed by april this year!
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Some said it would be close? What an endorsement.

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

mlw wrote:
k979aaa wrote:
dingo wrote:New times only 65 % voted in the General Election and 50% in the Scotish parliament elections. Sadly it's the way of life . Thatcher introduced postal ballots for unions cause it would always be a lower turn out then a workplace ballot.

Compared to other unions our returns are very good. Look at the Tessa and RMT ballots for example.
Not happy with the agreement nothing about bulling and harassment or dealing with cut offs other than that it is ok but what about those two points I gave?
And what are the new incentives supposed to be agreed by april this year!
Doesn't matter.
They won't be worth it.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.