ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

gross misconduct charge

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

Hi

I'm being charged with gross misconduct for swearing in reply to national message on a pda. I'm still doing my delivery and I never was suspended for it. My records are clear, never done anything seriously wrong. Are they really going to sack me for it when foul language is commonly used in my office?

Many thanks
IcanthelpthewayIam
Posts: 4067
Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by IcanthelpthewayIam »

diabolic wrote:Hi

I'm being charged with gross misconduct for swearing in reply to national message on a pda. I'm still doing my delivery and I never was suspended for it. My records are clear, never done anything seriously wrong. Are they really going to sack me for it when foul language is commonly used in my office?

Many thanks
depends on what was said, as long as it wasnt something too bad, ie racial, then you should be fine and would be surprised if you even get a serious warning
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

How bad " F#ck you c#nts" is?
feduppostie
Posts: 947
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 19:46

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by feduppostie »

did you send that as a reply on the PDA?
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

In reply to the message about privatisation.
IcanthelpthewayIam
Posts: 4067
Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by IcanthelpthewayIam »

diabolic wrote:In reply to the message about privatisation.
sorry i thought you meant out loud in the office, if its on the PDA you could be in trouble sorry!!
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by Himaggen »

It is worse than saying it to their face in the heat of battle, you were not under face to face pressure and even if you were relatively quick on the keypad you have had time to time to judge your own actions prior to sending the reply.
Notwithstanding the fact that it's misuse of Royal Mail equipment, and performed whilst 'on duty' it will also be treated in the same way as an email, social networking or text message communication. (and most businesses have rules regarding those).
mandelsons_toenail
Posts: 1294
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:16
Gender: Male
Location: Outer Hebrides

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by mandelsons_toenail »

diabolic wrote:How bad " F#ck you c#nts" is?
:Very Happy

I'm sorry for laughing but, that's brilliant.

You've basically said what 1500000 posties think.

:Applause

If you do end up out of work I will personally donate £20 to you my good man for saying that

On the other side.

Good luck :thumbup
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

I just assumed I'm replying to generic message that nobody would read. Have done it before and nothing happened. It was like saying "god damn it" to yourself after spilling coffee etc. So I'm doomed then...
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

Some of my managers where laughing too, But the area one wasn't. Didn't mean to cause offence. Was thinking loud on pda ;)
IcanthelpthewayIam
Posts: 4067
Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by IcanthelpthewayIam »

diabolic wrote:I just assumed I'm replying to generic message that nobody would read. Have done it before and nothing happened. It was like saying "god damn it" to yourself after spilling coffee etc. So I'm doomed then...
i wouldnt say doomed, i would imagine at worse a suspended dismissal
exetererica
Posts: 152
Joined: 07 Nov 2010, 11:21
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by exetererica »

.
Last edited by exetererica on 19 Apr 2020, 17:26, edited 1 time in total.
diabolic
Posts: 17
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 15:35
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by diabolic »

exetererica wrote:Not sure how they can prove it was you who sent the message.

Maybe someone else logged your PDA on, in your name...
I was honest and admitted it was me. I was convinced that I replied to a sms sending machine. I wasn't told that I shouldn't reply to those messages during pda training ;)
Jpro747
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Dec 2012, 10:22
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by Jpro747 »

diabolic wrote:How bad " F#ck you c#nts" is?
:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :Applause :Applause :thumbup
freelunch
Posts: 358
Joined: 14 Oct 2012, 20:39
Gender: Male

Re: gross misconduct charge

Post by freelunch »

Can't see them sacking you for an internal communication which isn't aimed at a particular staff member, isn't racist, etc.
It's not like you're giving the company a bad name. More likely you're in for a slapped wrist, and put on a warning.
"Everybody has a plan.. until they get punched in the face" - Mike Tyson