ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
How many are only bothered about the money?
-
postality
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 14 Feb 2013, 22:03
- Gender: Male
How many are only bothered about the money?
Seems to me in my office that the frustration everbody's venting is based purely on the fact that they might not get a nice fat lumper before christmas.
Seems a bit short sighted to me but I understand people are struggling...
Just wonder how much of the frustration and anger all over this forum is based on money alone.
Come on be honest!
Seems a bit short sighted to me but I understand people are struggling...
Just wonder how much of the frustration and anger all over this forum is based on money alone.
Come on be honest!
-
jack
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 14:32
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
Wouldn't surprise me, and moya knows this toopostality wrote:Seems to me in my office that the frustration everbody's venting is based purely on the fact that they might not get a nice fat lumper before christmas.
Seems a bit short sighted to me but I understand people are struggling...
Just wonder how much of the frustration and anger all over this forum is based on money alone.
Come on be honest!
'Royal Mail leaders could not lead a worm, they'll never take our pride cos that's what we earn'
-
interesting
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 29 Jun 2012, 19:16
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
Work load on delivery for me
The cash is a short term gain
The cash is a short term gain
-
Jynxx
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 198
- Joined: 07 Oct 2010, 16:48
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
The money is a concern I won't deny it, but considering I voted yes to strike, striked the last time round and voted against the last 2010 deal of the century (we all know how that turned out) I'm pretty sure I'm not a money grabbing bastard. 
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
A lot of those members will have voted yes to strike action purely because of pay issues.
It would be hypocritical for us as a union to campaign for and accept their votes and then criticise them for getting frustrated.
Whatever floats your boat I say.
It would be hypocritical for us as a union to campaign for and accept their votes and then criticise them for getting frustrated.
Whatever floats your boat I say.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Darren Bent
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 15:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: Pride Park, Derby, DE24 8XL
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
I want it sorted so I can get a new computer but need to work out when can I buy it and how much is my budget. Apart from that it is not good to see lack of success.
-
freelunch
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 14 Oct 2012, 20:39
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
a record number of forum members were logging in t'other day to find out when they're getting their £300
/sarc
/sarc
"Everybody has a plan.. until they get punched in the face" - Mike Tyson
-
bogstandard
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
its only money, spend it if i got it, don't if i haven't.
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
-
El-Bandito
- Posts: 313
- Joined: 27 Jan 2009, 14:14
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
You want honesty. Well here goes re "My office". 4th busiest in the country. Stick the cash up yer ring. We are still waiting for 2010 national agreement to kick in for fuxake. What happened to majority full time? Close to 50/50 here. I can't call it management bullying (BUT IT IS) I have to call it harassment. The p&l planners are a waste of space and should be strung up. 4 times they have re-jigged their calculations ffs. So NO its not about the money. ..postality wrote:Seems to me in my office that the frustration everbody's venting is based purely on the fact that they might not get a nice fat lumper before christmas.
Seems a bit short sighted to me but I understand people are struggling...
Just wonder how much of the frustration and anger all over this forum is based on money alone.
Come on be honest!
-
bandit1157
- Posts: 246
- Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 00:51
- Gender: Male
- Location: sh1t street
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
A few in the office I work in seem desperate for the £300 carrot. Personally I value my sheriffs badge higher than a lump sum.
It's life Jim but not as we know it
-
Martin Walsh
- Posts: 4276
- Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
- Location: neverland
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
My understanding is that the £300 is now £200 and the other £100 has gone into the pay rise so you get it week in week out year in year out.
-
tommytucka
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 05 May 2010, 16:13
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
And what about the backpay?dingo wrote:My understanding is that the £300 is now £200 and the other £100 has gone into the pay rise so you get it week in week out year in year out.
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
so is there a deal done then.dingo wrote:My understanding is that the £300 is now £200 and the other £100 has gone into the pay rise so you get it week in week out year in year out.
-
OnAFlyer
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 14:24
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
Almost exactly what I predicted ages ago, a small increase meaning the 3 year deal is around 9% with a lump sum as a sweetener.dingo wrote:My understanding is that the £300 is now £200 and the other £100 has gone into the pay rise so you get it week in week out year in year out.
And the 35 weeks (and counting) of back pay?
-
Jynxx
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 198
- Joined: 07 Oct 2010, 16:48
- Gender: Male
Re: How many are only bothered about the money?
If the deal doesn't include back pay I'll be voting against it regardless of what else is on the table.One reason I voted against the 2010 Deal due to the removal of d2d payments, delivery's still haven't had a pay rise as far as we're concerned due to the loss of the d2d money.
Some duties lost as much as £60 a week (3 a week) and with d2d's forever on the increase we're losing even more money, not to mention the colleague share fiasco...regarding that I thought the union was supposed to be raising the subject with RM in the current talks.
I'm getting fed up with being offered the same pay deal just jumbled around to appear to be better when RM will be laughing at us for the 50 million was it? they have already saved in back pay from April.
Some duties lost as much as £60 a week (3 a week) and with d2d's forever on the increase we're losing even more money, not to mention the colleague share fiasco...regarding that I thought the union was supposed to be raising the subject with RM in the current talks.
I'm getting fed up with being offered the same pay deal just jumbled around to appear to be better when RM will be laughing at us for the 50 million was it? they have already saved in back pay from April.