ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Suddenly leaving union
-
viking
- Posts: 245
- Joined: 13 Sep 2009, 21:22
- Gender: Female
Suddenly leaving union
How many union members in your office have suddenly decided to leave the union when there is any mention of strike action, giving themselves an excuse to cross the picket line on strike days, and not lose pay. In the past we had several posties who would do this and then surprise surprise after all the "fuss" had died down, rejoin the union
. Isnt it about time that the union said NO to these people, or are they really SO desperate for the money generated from union subs regardless of principles.
-
Postie_since_1989
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 20 Oct 2013, 11:34
- Gender: Male
Re: Suddenly leaving union
Surprisingly in my Unit we have actually had most of the non members sign up, so that they can go on strike!
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Suddenly leaving union
good on themPostie_since_1989 wrote:Surprisingly in my Unit we have actually had most of the non members sign up, so that they can go on strike!
-
dazzlin72
- Posts: 321
- Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 13:56
- Gender: Male
Re: Suddenly leaving union
I'm sure i read somewhere that because of the dwindling membership numbers, & loss of revenue, the RM would put into the pot?, i may be wrong. But, if this was the case, isn't it a conflict of interest and surely shouldn't be allowed to happen, as then you have the RM being benefactors, & no wonder we don't get any decent agreements.
-
Lincox
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
- Gender: Male
Re: Suddenly leaving union
I cannot see this being the case, for a start any contribution would have to be explained in the accounts.
-
hantsman
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 876
- Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 09:33
- Gender: Male
Re: Suddenly leaving union
dazzlin72 wrote:I'm sure i read somewhere that because of the dwindling membership numbers, & loss of revenue, the RM would put into the pot?, i may be wrong. But, if this was the case, isn't it a conflict of interest and surely shouldn't be allowed to happen, as then you have the RM being benefactors, & no wonder we don't get any decent agreements.
Where did you read this then, obsolete rubbish.