ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
-
dt123
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 10 Aug 2007, 13:00
all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
When you take part in any vote you do so expecting to accept the majority decision. If the vote would of returned a no then I would be expected to respect that view. If I refused to accept that view and went on strike then I would be breaking the law by taking unlawful industrial action. The same respect should be given by the no voters. Anyone who strike breakers and takes the 300 pound blood money should have their right to vote removed, if you are not going to accept the result then why should you be allowed to have your say.
-
Chelseablue
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
- Gender: Female
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
Theres no 300 quid
-
gand
- Posts: 253
- Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 17:36
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
What should happen to the strike breakers is that they should be given the deal as it stands now and not the deal who the people with balls to go on strike get
-
darren d
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 16:08
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
I voted yes to IA, but this £300 thing, correct me if im wrong , is given if the DO as a unit does not take IA. Surely its not given to individuals who cross the picket line is it?
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16692
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
What should happen is the more "enlightened" union members should by force of their strong arguments convince the less enlightened of the error of their ways.
"strike breakers" this and "strike breakers" that is merely divisive and ultimately self-defeating.
"strike breakers" this and "strike breakers" that is merely divisive and ultimately self-defeating.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
Chelseablue
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
- Gender: Female
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
It's not given at all 300 is not on the table ,
-
IcanthelpthewayIam
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
lets try again, THERE IS NO £300 for not striking during this industrial action
-
darren d
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 16:08
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
I thought it was Chelsea blueChelseablue wrote:It's not given at all 300 is not on the table ,
-
trevjim
- Posts: 170
- Joined: 05 Dec 2012, 20:04
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
Im a 'Scab' and I agree this would be fair.gand wrote:What should happen to the strike breakers is that they should be given the deal as it stands now and not the deal who the people with balls to go on strike get
And to the OP, that is the most ignorant thing ive read on here, Its like saying, those that dont vote lib dems should not be allowed to vote as its not the same vote as you
-
IcanthelpthewayIam
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
so a question for you:dt123 wrote:When you take part in any vote you do so expecting to accept the majority decision. If the vote would of returned a no then I would be expected to respect that view. If I refused to accept that view and went on strike then I would be breaking the law by taking unlawful industrial action. The same respect should be given by the no voters. Anyone who strike breakers and takes the 300 pound blood money should have their right to vote removed, if you are not going to accept the result then why should you be allowed to have your say.
in your opinion should strike breakers be kicked out of the union then?
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16692
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
Due to listening to her people (obviously not the ones we need protection from) Moya has changed her mind and it is still apparently being offered on an individual basis but as part of a pay deal that has been rejected.darren d wrote:I voted yes to IA, but this £300 thing, correct me if im wrong , is given if the DO as a unit does not take IA. Surely its not given to individuals who cross the picket line is it?
So the £300 doesn't exist but Moya is offering it to individuals who cross the picket line.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
darren d
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 16:08
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
Ahhh right. Thanks for that clashcityrocker :-)clashcityrocker wrote:Due to listening to her people (obviously not the ones we need protection from) Moya has changed her mind and it is still apparently being offered on an individual basis but as part of a pay deal that has been rejected.darren d wrote:I voted yes to IA, but this £300 thing, correct me if im wrong , is given if the DO as a unit does not take IA. Surely its not given to individuals who cross the picket line is it?
So the £300 doesn't exist but Moya is offering it to individuals who cross the picket line.
-
darren d
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 16:08
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
Tell you what narks me...We have a scab who crossed the line last time. Then got into bad trouble and then joined the union to help him out. In the words of Roy Hodson " its a disgrace" shouldn't be allowed :-(
-
darren d
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 16:08
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
Yes deffozx135 wrote:so a question for you:dt123 wrote:When you take part in any vote you do so expecting to accept the majority decision. If the vote would of returned a no then I would be expected to respect that view. If I refused to accept that view and went on strike then I would be breaking the law by taking unlawful industrial action. The same respect should be given by the no voters. Anyone who strike breakers and takes the 300 pound blood money should have their right to vote removed, if you are not going to accept the result then why should you be allowed to have your say.
in your opinion should strike breakers be kicked out of the union then?
-
steven100
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: 09 Aug 2009, 12:35
- Gender: Male
Re: all strike breakers should not be allowed a vote.
Personally if you scab we should go back to the medival days(we getting close
) were you'd be burnt at a stake or if it is a female "witch witch"
, down do the river.