ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
DICKIEG
Posts: 158
Joined: 27 Jun 2011, 19:07
Gender: Male

UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by DICKIEG »

I have just opened my free shares information and there is an opt out clause form in there, just out of interest, how many union reps (who are against privatisation) are going to send their opt out forms back saying "no thankyou i dont want any". It seems one way or another the privatisation will go through, so why not accept them, i will. Unless anyone can explain why i shouldnt
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by doorstepped »

I am a union rep and I will be accepting them and so should everyone else, sending them back will mean nothing to RM bosses as all that will happen is those share that are allocated to those who refuse will get shared out to those who have accepted them.

I hope everyone accepts them and hopefully will be happy to give them back if Labour decide to re-nationalize the company should they get back in in 2015. ( I can live in hope can't I? )

I am however still waiting to receive my free share pack, perhaps being a rep means I won't be getting any anyway :)
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by cloherty1976 »

If labour renationalised the Royal Mail they would still have to buy the the shares off you and give you the money as you would be the legal owner.
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by doorstepped »

not correct, RM will hold your shares in trust for a minimum of three years, you will still get the dividend's paid out and then you can sell the shares or continue to keep them, therefor RM will get the money back from the government at the price they sold them at.
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by cloherty1976 »

After the 3 years passed would they have to buy them back at the market rate?
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by doorstepped »

correct, but as the next general election is in May 2015 that will come before the three years has lapsed :)
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by cloherty1976 »

Did you listen to the mp chucka who said he would not be writing a blank cheque for this to happen?
worktotime
Posts: 2866
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by worktotime »

doorstepped wrote:correct, but as the next general election is in May 2015 that will come before the three years has lapsed :)
so with it being within the 3 years for us to give the shares back for free when labour get in , what happens to every tom dick and harry who have bought the shares ? does that mean we would have s**t on again with shares.
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by cloherty1976 »

No the government would have to buy them back at a market price and get agreement from shareholders
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by fishtank »

cloherty1976 wrote:No the government would have to buy them back at a market price and get agreement from shareholders
It's unlikely Labour will agree to renationalise Royal Mail by choice.
It is possible that the business could find itself in deep financial trouble again and faced with the possibility of bankruptcy a government might be forced to take it back into public ownership to protect the USO.
In that case like the Railtrack/Network Rail fiasco you could end up with next to nothing.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16676
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by clashcityrocker »

DICKIEG wrote:I have just opened my free shares information and there is an opt out clause form in there, just out of interest, how many union reps (who are against privatisation) are going to send their opt out forms back saying "no thankyou i dont want any". It seems one way or another the privatisation will go through, so why not accept them, i will. Unless anyone can explain why i shouldnt
I won't accept them because:
Any dividend or increase in value will I believe , be a direct result of job losses and the degradation in terms of conditions of those that remain.
Do I want to stain my hands with that blood money? No thank you.
I don't own shares in any company. I don't subscribe to the share-owning democracy crap. I won't accept the bribe.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
viking1488
Posts: 446
Joined: 15 May 2009, 15:37
Gender: Male

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by viking1488 »

cloherty1976 wrote:If labour renationalised the Royal Mail they would still have to buy the the shares off you and give you the money as you would be the legal owner.
but your not the legal owner if you are how can they be took off you if you leave or get sacked this is just a load of bull s**t
borgpicard
Posts: 486
Joined: 05 May 2011, 22:45
Gender: Male

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by borgpicard »

doorstepped wrote:I am a union rep and I will be accepting them and so should everyone else, sending them back will mean nothing to RM bosses as all that will happen is those share that are allocated to those who refuse will get shared out to those who have accepted them.

I hope everyone accepts them and hopefully will be happy to give them back if Labour decide to re-nationalize the company should they get back in in 2015. ( I can live in hope can't I? )

I am however still waiting to receive my free share pack, perhaps being a rep means I won't be getting any anyway :)

im a rep too, and i will take anything these bastards offer, as we get enough lies and bullshit every day
AnotherLimey
Posts: 751
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:45
Gender: Male

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by AnotherLimey »

DICKIEG wrote:I have just opened my free shares information and there is an opt out clause form in there, just out of interest, how many union reps (who are against privatisation) are going to send their opt out forms back saying "no thankyou i dont want any". It seems one way or another the privatisation will go through, so why not accept them, i will. Unless anyone can explain why i shouldnt
I was a rep but quite a few weeks ago due to many frustrations, being some of my members (the runners, the coming in early bragade and alike) also felt let down by my branch, and many other things i could go into but wont bother to mention why i quit, why would i not take the shares on offer? i understand standing up for your beliefs but i would be losing out while my so called members took the cash, to many people on here slaging the union and more important the local reps but looking after themselves, speak to the hand :speak to the hand
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16676
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: UNION LEADERS / FREE SHARES

Post by clashcityrocker »

AnotherLimey wrote: why would i not take the shares on offer?
Because the value of your shares will be dependant on anti-worker measures.
If your trade union principles can be bought off with the promise of the possibility of a couple of grand, then .......you can finish the sentence yourself.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.