ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
-
resperin
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 18 Feb 2009, 21:45
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
IB done this at another office near me; a full timer left the van on with reg at the front, tracked, packets etc. he got taken off driving for a couple weeks. then they got a different manager, and it wasnt brought up again. hes back on driving.
another person diddnt tie his trolley up he just got advice
it all depends on the manager; IB will catch/find, but the manager makes the descicion on what level they take it in terms of conduct code
another person diddnt tie his trolley up he just got advice
it all depends on the manager; IB will catch/find, but the manager makes the descicion on what level they take it in terms of conduct code
-
Phantom
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 18:17
- Gender: Female
- Location: New York
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
Or do the job properly and you don't have this kind of worry. Simples! No short cuts!
CUT OFF!!!
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
we all make mistakes of varying degrees,people are simply pointing out the unfairness of the punishment.
-
postiel
- Posts: 56
- Joined: 05 May 2007, 09:34
- Location: south
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
can they take away his pension.
years of perfect service and one mistake.
surely not
years of perfect service and one mistake.
surely not
-
cloherty1976
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: The south
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
I think your jumping the gun here. No one knows the facts and outcome and you seem to have already charged a fellow colleague.
-
RobertT
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 6692
- Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 14:26
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
His pension will be deferred as if he left the company under normal circumstances.postiel wrote:can they take away his pension.
years of perfect service and one mistake.
surely not
Links to all RM pension related websites are here
-
parcelboy
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 206
- Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 17:41
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
Like helping a member of public and it being turned into "Wilful Delay" amazing what a greivance can do to bring about your dismissal.Untill this regime of corrupt "Management"is replaced i feel things will never change.Looks like there using IB to do dirty work now what a good company to work for W******chickenwittle wrote:we all make mistakes of varying degrees,people are simply pointing out the unfairness of the punishment.
-
Lance Jack
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 13 Nov 2012, 16:44
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
You sure these are IB and not just some sort of Manager doing a check? The way I understand it the IB are very short staffed and only react when a pattern becomes apparent. The idea that they just have a look to see if you are doing something wrong, which you may or may not be, seems like it maybe a lower level of IB or not them at all.
I had two of these stop me last year and ask me why I had not locked my bike? I said can you not see the great big U-lock through the frame and back wheel? He said "Oh yes, keep it up" and walked off.
I had two of these stop me last year and ask me why I had not locked my bike? I said can you not see the great big U-lock through the frame and back wheel? He said "Oh yes, keep it up" and walked off.
-
BernardBresslaw
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
Say, for example, you deliver a rural delivery in a van, and you are delivering down a long rural-ish road, but the houses are close together, how would you deliver that to be IB-safe? Would you seriously edge a few meters a time, in your van, turn the engine off, lock all the doors, walk up the path, deliver the letters, then walk down the path, unlock the van again, start the engine, then repeat?
A genuine question. I always thought, in that scenario, as long as the van is close, and you see it at all times, you can leave the engine running?
A genuine question. I always thought, in that scenario, as long as the van is close, and you see it at all times, you can leave the engine running?
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
I sympathise with our colleague, but this is why we must do the job properly. No rushing, no cutting corners, just do the job to spec.
Royal Mail bosses want to have their cake, and eat it........Don't give 'em that satisfaction.
Royal Mail bosses want to have their cake, and eat it........Don't give 'em that satisfaction.
-
UnhappyGremlin
- Posts: 2685
- Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
- Gender: Male
- Location: Hiding
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
That's absolutely correct.BernardBresslaw wrote:Say, for example, you deliver a rural delivery in a van, and you are delivering down a long rural-ish road, but the houses are close together, how would you deliver that to be IB-safe? Would you seriously edge a few meters a time, in your van, turn the engine off, lock all the doors, walk up the path, deliver the letters, then walk down the path, unlock the van again, start the engine, then repeat?
That is a dismissal offence.A genuine question. I always thought, in that scenario, as long as the van is close, and you see it at all times, you can leave the engine running?
As earlier stated by JimmyCarrsLaugh, if you're FT you'll be gone, PT you may survive.
Plus why try to cut corners? Do as it should be done, and they have nothing on you. If it takes you over time, either book it or cut off (under correct procedures obviously).
It's not like it used to be, I've known lads that have had vans stolen and not even gotten a written warning, just a verbal. But those days are long gone. Don't give them the excuse to sack you, because they will.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
-
arnold cheshire
- Posts: 5309
- Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
- Gender: Male
- Location: england
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
we had a PT guy sacked for using his car no one is immune
-
fmrPOSTIE
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 674
- Joined: 29 Oct 2008, 20:52
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
OP - are you sure of the facts ....? I don't believe IB conduct these sorts of investigations anyway u have no idea on their staffing levels ( believe me it's insignificant ).
Plus all speculative
Plus all speculative
-
BernardBresslaw
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
Oh it's nothing to do with cutting corners, I honestly didn't know. Thanks. I can't see my battered old Vauxhall surviving that punishment. It's had 3 radiator faults in a month.UnhappyGremlin wrote:That's absolutely correct.BernardBresslaw wrote:Say, for example, you deliver a rural delivery in a van, and you are delivering down a long rural-ish road, but the houses are close together, how would you deliver that to be IB-safe? Would you seriously edge a few meters a time, in your van, turn the engine off, lock all the doors, walk up the path, deliver the letters, then walk down the path, unlock the van again, start the engine, then repeat?That is a dismissal offence.A genuine question. I always thought, in that scenario, as long as the van is close, and you see it at all times, you can leave the engine running?
As earlier stated by JimmyCarrsLaugh, if you're FT you'll be gone, PT you may survive.
Plus why try to cut corners? Do as it should be done, and they have nothing on you. If it takes you over time, either book it or cut off (under correct procedures obviously).
It's not like it used to be, I've known lads that have had vans stolen and not even gotten a written warning, just a verbal. But those days are long gone. Don't give them the excuse to sack you, because they will.
-
OnAFlyer
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 14:24
- Gender: Male
Re: The IB and the difference between PT and FT staff
Surely you'd park up, the van, lock it then deliver to at least several houses before moving the van again if they are that close together? It sounds like your describing driving door to door to some terraced housesBernardBresslaw wrote:Say, for example, you deliver a rural delivery in a van, and you are delivering down a long rural-ish road, but the houses are close together, how would you deliver that to be IB-safe? Would you seriously edge a few meters a time, in your van, turn the engine off, lock all the doors, walk up the path, deliver the letters, then walk down the path, unlock the van again, start the engine, then repeat?
A genuine question. I always thought, in that scenario, as long as the van is close, and you see it at all times, you can leave the engine running?
I always always lock the van up, even if I'm stood 2 yards away delivering a parcel to a house fronting onto the pavement. And never carry stuff on the passenger seat apart from the drop you're going to, it's not even any quicker than just opening the back door to get the parcels.
It seems to be quite lenient in our office though, we've had stuff stolen from a van that wasn't locked and a window smashed to grab stuff left on the passenger seat but nothing happened to the staff responsible.