D2D "aslong as there done by sat"

[post_bitch]

Isnt this a bit contradicting?

http://www.stopjunkmail.org.uk/news/articles/070724.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

appeal the appeal?

How can capital one not be getting the service they paid for aslong as they are delivered by the end of the week?

[post_bitch]

Is it a sackable offense to delay D2D even if they are done later in the week?

[krussel]

Well if you go by that article then yes it is.

[post_bitch]

[fishtank]

Is it a sackable offense to delay D2D even if they are done later in the week?

It wasn't D2D.
It's also 6 years old and obviously the title was written by a 6 year old.
How do you "loose" your job?

[TrueBlueTerrier]

Is it a sackable offense to delay D2D even if they are done later in the week?

It wasn't D2D.
It's also 6 years old and obviously the title was written by a 6 year old.
How do you "loose" your job?

untie it.

[chrisj]

[Pat Ostman]

Is it a sackable offense to delay D2D even if they are done later in the week?

It wasn't D2D.
It's also 6 years old and obviously the title was written by a 6 year old.
How do you "loose" your job?

That's what I thought. Didn't seem to be door to doors. Mailsort perhaps?

[kilrenny]

as long as they are done by the end of the week.
Door 2 Door - Unagreed Delivery Procedure



Further to LTB 477/13 issued on the 10th July 2013 this LTB is being sent to reaffirm the CWU position that there is no agreement with the CWU to alter the terms of the National Agreement, and that it still holds the field.



For ease of reference the BT 2010 Agreement states the following:



"Whilst the planned workload will be spread across the 6 days, delivery employees will have the ability to manage the delivery of the items themselves on the proviso that all items are delivered within the week and the delivery specification is not affected".



Any proposals or edicts to impose changes to a unit's preferred method of delivering D2D providing the preferred method is compliant with the National Agreement should be dealt with via the Industrial Relations Framework.



In addition, at our meeting with Royal Mail on the 16th July 2013 we raised the reports we were receiving that indicated that an unagreed procedure requiring our members to only deliver Door to Door items to address points where they have ‘live mail' i.e. no ‘cold calling' was being deployed. They responded by stating that there is no edict from Royal Mail nationally for this to be introduced.



Branches/Representatives are therefore advised to register disagreement where management attempt to deploy this unagreed approach.



We have also informed Royal Mail that this unagreed approach is completely contrary to the National Agreement and sends the wrong message to our members, in that it creates the perception that D2D is not the same as normal mail when the whole concept of putting D2D into workload was so that it would be treated as normal mail to assist in the development of D2D as a product to protect jobs.

[chrisj]

jimmy, how does your cover feel about having so many d2ds left in the frame on tuesday? (i said tuesday because you might have cleared most by tuesday or wed as you say.

what happens when you have a long weekend?

[chrisj]

Yes, you did say most weeks... But the 80% or so clear rate on Monday really explained the floater part of my question.

It is nice to read from someone who actually makes an effort to explain - instead one liners...

The joke about PHGs playing money is a bit OTT! Even families don't have time (or take time) to play Monopoly these days: maybe the play the abridged version or timed???

[kingeric]

Is 6 the maximum amount of d2d's that can be allocated to a walk each week?

[clashcityrocker]

Is 6 the maximum amount of d2d's that can be allocated to a walk each week?

No.

[TrueBlueTerrier]

Is 6 the maximum amount of d2d's that can be allocated to a walk each week?

no

[kingeric]

Is 6 the maximum amount of d2d's that can be allocated to a walk each week?

no

So i presume there is no maximum then?