dvbuk55 wrote:Surely the union will be picking up the fees for tribunals, win or lose.
Yes they have already said so - with provisions and caveats of course.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts. Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility. If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
dvbuk55 wrote:Surely the union will be picking up the fees for tribunals, win or lose.
And what about he case's when the union are not involved and have ‘primed’ and ‘intimidated’ witnesses, during a series of internal inquiries. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... acism.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
dvbuk55 wrote:Surely the union will be picking up the fees for tribunals, win or lose.
And what about he case's when the union are not involved and have ‘primed’ and ‘intimidated’ witnesses, during a series of internal inquiries. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... acism.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
they looked at my case (CWU HO) and said i had less than a 50% chance of winning so they didnt represent me.
my local rep said i had a good chance....i represented myself and won 3-0 3-0...a complete whitewash.
willt he cwu represent a case deemed under 50% perceived chance of winning now there are more costs?
flaminmoses wrote:they looked at my case (CWU HO) and said i had less than a 50% chance of winning so they didnt represent me.
my local rep said i had a good chance....i represented myself and won 3-0 3-0...a complete whitewash.
willt he cwu represent a case deemed under 50% perceived chance of winning now there are more costs?
flaminmoses wrote:they looked at my case (CWU HO) and said i had less than a 50% chance of winning so they didnt represent me.
my local rep said i had a good chance....i represented myself and won 3-0 3-0...a complete whitewash.
willt he cwu represent a case deemed under 50% perceived chance of winning now there are more costs?
i doubt it
I agree.
Royal Mail managers.....about as popular as a t.urd in a swimming pool!
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
flaminmoses wrote:they looked at my case (CWU HO) and said i had less than a 50% chance of winning so they didnt represent me.
my local rep said i had a good chance....i represented myself and won 3-0 3-0...a complete whitewash.
willt he cwu represent a case deemed under 50% perceived chance of winning now there are more costs?
i doubt it
I agree.
Hi General.
I got the IHR they tried to deny me....although it ended up being for a back problem