ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Overlooked

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
goona
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 May 2007, 21:23
Gender: Male
Location: Kent

Overlooked

Post by goona »

Long story short

Been part time for years and waiting for a full time contract.

Full timer to leave shortly and just found out that we are to get a transferee in on a full time contract.

Does this sound right ?

PS. Going through a Lark and Poop revision now
music4essex
Posts: 717
Joined: 15 Oct 2009, 16:18
Gender: Female

Re: Overlooked

Post by music4essex »

Yes it can happen, as it did to me ,

If the person transferring in is done on welfare reasons then yes it can, :cry

I did finally get to fulltime though .

I have been fulltime when i started 24yrs ago/ then part time for 10yrs then back to fulltime

Essex mum :cuppa
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: Overlooked

Post by arnold cheshire »

goona wrote:Long story short

Been part time for years and waiting for a full time contract.

Full timer to leave shortly and just found out that we are to get a transferee in on a full time contract.

Does this sound right ?

PS. Going through a Lark and Poop revision now
2 years or 10 years? has anybody else been made full time with less seniority than you ?
goona
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 May 2007, 21:23
Gender: Male
Location: Kent

Re: Overlooked

Post by goona »

music4essex wrote:Yes it can happen, as it did to me ,

If the person transferring in is done on welfare reasons then yes it can, :cry

I did finally get to fulltime though .

I have been fulltime when i started 24yrs ago/ then part time for 10yrs then back to fulltime

Essex mum :cuppa

Thanks for the reply Essex mum.

Looks like i'll just have to wait and see.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32782
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Overlooked

Post by POSTMAN »

http://www.cwu-e4.co.uk/Royal_Mail_Way_ ... eement.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Way Forward,page 29 and onwards.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: Overlooked

Post by arnold cheshire »

goona wrote:Long story short

Been part time for years and waiting for a full time contract.

Full timer to leave shortly and just found out that we are to get a transferee in on a full time contract.

Does this sound right ?

PS. Going through a Lark and Poop revision now
not enough info goona :wave
goona
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 May 2007, 21:23
Gender: Male
Location: Kent

Re: Overlooked

Post by goona »

bringon4dayweeks wrote:2 years or 10 years? has anybody else been made full time with less seniority than you ?
7 years and nobody made full time.

Everytime a full timer leaves they make the duty part time
goona
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 May 2007, 21:23
Gender: Male
Location: Kent

Re: Overlooked

Post by goona »

POSTMAN wrote:http://www.cwu-e4.co.uk/Royal_Mail_Way_ ... eement.pdf

Way Forward,page 29 and onwards.
Cheers Postman, looks like I might have a case then.

I'll get our union involved.
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: Overlooked

Post by arnold cheshire »

goona wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:http://www.cwu-e4.co.uk/Royal_Mail_Way_ ... eement.pdf

Way Forward,page 29 and onwards.
Cheers Postman, looks like I might have a case then.

I'll get our union involved.
i dont see how that helps
goona
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 May 2007, 21:23
Gender: Male
Location: Kent

Re: Overlooked

Post by goona »

bringon4dayweeks wrote:
goona wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:http://www.cwu-e4.co.uk/Royal_Mail_Way_ ... eement.pdf

Way Forward,page 29 and onwards.
Cheers Postman, looks like I might have a case then.

I'll get our union involved.
i dont see how that helps
Why not ?

As Essex mum says unless the person transfering in is a wefare case or they are closing
their office down and they have less seniority why should the person get a 39 hour contract
when I have been told for the past 7 years there is no extra hours
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16679
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Overlooked

Post by clashcityrocker »

goona wrote:
Why not ?

unless the person transfering in is a wefare case or they are closing
their office down and they have less seniority why should the person get a 39 hour contract
when I have been told for the past 7 years there is no extra hours
IF they have less seniority.
You don't make that point in the original post.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: Overlooked

Post by arnold cheshire »

goona wrote:
bringon4dayweeks wrote:
goona wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:http://www.cwu-e4.co.uk/Royal_Mail_Way_ ... eement.pdf

Way Forward,page 29 and onwards.
Cheers Postman, looks like I might have a case then.

I'll get our union involved.
i dont see how that helps
Why not ?

As Essex mum says unless the person transfering in is a wefare case or they are closing
their office down and they have less seniority why should the person get a 39 hour contract
when I have been told for the past 7 years there is no extra hours
good luck goona
goona
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 May 2007, 21:23
Gender: Male
Location: Kent

Re: Overlooked

Post by goona »

clashcityrocker wrote:
goona wrote:
Why not ?

unless the person transfering in is a wefare case or they are closing
their office down and they have less seniority why should the person get a 39 hour contract
when I have been told for the past 7 years there is no extra hours
IF they have less seniority.
You don't make that point in the original post.
Sorry :oops:
goona
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 May 2007, 21:23
Gender: Male
Location: Kent

Re: Overlooked

Post by goona »

bringon4dayweeks wrote:
goona wrote:
bringon4dayweeks wrote:
goona wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:http://www.cwu-e4.co.uk/Royal_Mail_Way_ ... eement.pdf

Way Forward,page 29 and onwards.
Cheers Postman, looks like I might have a case then.

I'll get our union involved.
i dont see how that helps
Why not ?

As Essex mum says unless the person transfering in is a wefare case or they are closing
their office down and they have less seniority why should the person get a 39 hour contract
when I have been told for the past 7 years there is no extra hours
good luck goona
Thank you
roger
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 148
Joined: 17 Feb 2007, 18:51

Re: Overlooked

Post by roger »

goona wrote:
bringon4dayweeks wrote:
goona wrote:
bringon4dayweeks wrote:
goona wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:http://www.cwu-e4.co.uk/Royal_Mail_Way_ ... eement.pdf

Way Forward,page 29 and onwards.
Cheers Postman, looks like I might have a case then.

I'll get our union involved.
i dont see how that helps
Why not ?

As Essex mum says unless the person transfering in is a wefare case or they are closing
their office down and they have less seniority why should the person get a 39 hour contract
when I have been told for the past 7 years there is no extra hours
good luck goona
Thank you
You should check out the MTSF,because if there are surplus full time posties in your area then they also get priority.