ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Lump sums for imposed revisions

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by Big Daz »

Do RML still pay the lump sums on imposed revisions?
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by fishtank »

Big Daz wrote:Do RML still pay the lump sums on imposed revisions?

How do you get to the stage of an imposed revision?
That's what the IR Framework and rule 13 is for.
You know that already Daz.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16689
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by clashcityrocker »

What if your area/Branch see more benefit in the revision going in and don't support a unit that doesn't want it?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by fishtank »

clashcityrocker wrote:What if your area/Branch see more benefit in the revision going in and don't support a unit that doesn't want it?
If you have followed the IR Framework the Area/Branch will have had their input but have to support the members decision.
It's their revision,It doesn't belong to Branch.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16689
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by clashcityrocker »

fishtank wrote: It's their revision,It doesn't belong to Branch.
But there has to be more to the argument than "we don't want the revision".
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by fishtank »

clashcityrocker wrote:
fishtank wrote: It's their revision,It doesn't belong to Branch.
But there has to be more to the argument than "we don't want the revision".
I assume there is if it's gone all the way through the IR Framework. :neutral:
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16689
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by clashcityrocker »

But if you've been through the 6 step revision process, ensured the A+ is accurate and verified all the info in Georoute etc, what is left but "it's not going to work"?
What exactly is the disagreement about?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
hatetheboss
Posts: 191
Joined: 11 Jul 2009, 04:39
Gender: Male
Location: Back Of Beyond

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by hatetheboss »

clashcityrocker wrote:But if you've been through the 6 step revision process, ensured the A+ is accurate and verified all the info in Georoute etc, what is left but "it's not going to work"?
What exactly is the disagreement about?
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
They are coming to take us away
masterblaster
Posts: 285
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 20:12
Gender: Male

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by masterblaster »

Been waiting 6 years for bonus payment for imposed revision.
Excuses include lost e-mail.
New manger.
It's on some else's desk.
Union useless as usual.
viking1488
Posts: 446
Joined: 15 May 2009, 15:37
Gender: Male

Re: Lump sums for imposed revisions

Post by viking1488 »

rm are full of s**t dont believe a word of it lump sums shares etc maybe for those of us who are left after the biggest cull in rm history wake up this time u are fighting for your job