ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

another unanswered question about the new sickness policy

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
BingBong
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 755
Joined: 12 May 2011, 12:36
Gender: Female
Location: the north

another unanswered question about the new sickness policy

Post by BingBong »

I am aware that with the new sickeness policy that some people will get their stages reset if it applys to them. i was just wondering do people who arent on stages but have had some abscence get their days reset or is it people on stages only?
Toon Army!
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by doorstepped »

Your days will not get reset, however you will not trigger an informal or formal meeting if you stay within the required attendance requirments for the following 6 months from your first absence.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by fishtank »

doorstepped wrote:however you will not trigger an informal or formal meeting if you stay within the required attendance requirments for the following 6 months from your first absence.
The informal review process has nothing to do with the attendance standards.
A manager can request an informal review at any time he/she decides that the employee's attendance is becoming "a cause for concern".
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
BingBong
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 755
Joined: 12 May 2011, 12:36
Gender: Female
Location: the north

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by BingBong »

doorstepped wrote:Your days will not get reset, however you will not trigger an informal or formal meeting if you stay within the required attendance requirments for the following 6 months from your first absence.
As opposed to what what it used to be, 12 months?
Toon Army!
BingBong
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 755
Joined: 12 May 2011, 12:36
Gender: Female
Location: the north

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by BingBong »

doorstepped wrote:Your days will not get reset, however you will not trigger an informal or formal meeting if you stay within the required attendance requirments for the following 6 months from your first absence.
Last edited by BingBong on 04 Sep 2013, 19:22, edited 1 time in total.
Toon Army!
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by fishtank »

BrokenFlowers wrote:
doorstepped wrote:Your days will not get reset, however you will not trigger an informal or formal meeting if you stay within the required attendance requirments for the following 6 months from your first absence.
ok my last abscence was in sept 2012...so is it safe to say that my slate is now clean?
No.
The standards have not changed.
It's still 4 absences or 14 days in any 12 month period.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
BingBong
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 755
Joined: 12 May 2011, 12:36
Gender: Female
Location: the north

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by BingBong »

fishtank wrote:
BrokenFlowers wrote:
doorstepped wrote:Your days will not get reset, however you will not trigger an informal or formal meeting if you stay within the required attendance requirments for the following 6 months from your first absence.
Last edited by BingBong on 04 Sep 2013, 19:23, edited 1 time in total.
Toon Army!
SP115
Posts: 178
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 17:52
Gender: Male
Location: Location: Location

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by SP115 »

fishtank wrote: The standards have not changed.
It's still 4 absences or 14 days in any 12 month period.
If you have say 2 weeks off sick, But you only work 3 days (25 hrs) would that be classed as 14 days sick or 6?

Cheers

Edit: 100th post :nana :nana
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by fishtank »

SP115 wrote:
fishtank wrote: The standards have not changed.
It's still 4 absences or 14 days in any 12 month period.
If you have say 2 weeks off sick, But you only work 3 days (25 hrs) would that be classed as 14 days sick or 6?

Cheers

Edit: 100th post :nana :nana
14 days unfortunately.
Congratulations on your 100th post.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by arnold cheshire »

SP115 wrote:
fishtank wrote: The standards have not changed.
It's still 4 absences or 14 days in any 12 month period.
If you have say 2 weeks off sick, But you only work 3 days (25 hrs) would that be classed as 14 days sick or 6?

Cheers

Edit: 100th post :nana :nana
you collect 100 pound for 100 posts well done
Pat Ostman
Posts: 2797
Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 21:53
Gender: Male
Location: In the Line Managers office being screwed over.

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by Pat Ostman »

Fish,

What if you received a stage 1 in November but stay clean and come off the stage (six months). As the absence was included in a stage, but still within the current (12 months) year, can that absence be recalled in any further stages.

Or is a line drawn under absences already used for a triggered stage.
Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun.
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by fishtank »

Pat Ostman wrote:Fish,

What if you received a stage 1 in November but stay clean and come off the stage (six months). As the absence was included in a stage, but still within the current (12 months) year, can that absence be recalled in any further stages.

Or is a line drawn under absences already used for a triggered stage.
I can't see how they can draw a line under it because it wouldn't be fair on someone who had gone sick in November,not triggered a stage but stayed clean for 6 months.

To be honest having a 12 month Attendance Standard Period but only a 6 month Attendance Review Period is going to throw up some issues,this appears to be one of them.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
graffi
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 186
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 11:34
Gender: Male

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by graffi »

Fish I asked this question and they replied if you break the standards in the 12 month peripd you will trigger an Attendance Review 1 Prompt and the discussions will take place.
mailmonkey
Posts: 431
Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 22:12
Gender: Male

Re: another unanswered question about the new sickness polic

Post by mailmonkey »

Pat Ostman wrote:Fish,

What if you received a stage 1 in November but stay clean and come off the stage (six months). As the absence was included in a stage, but still within the current (12 months) year, can that absence be recalled in any further stages.

Or is a line drawn under absences already used for a triggered stage.
This is a very good question.

if a line is NOT drawn under the absence, then the same absence could just trigger another stage warning for a day's sickness at a later time.

needs clarification.