Why
Please do not name any individuals on here,use their 'work title' or 'my/a colleague' ect instead.
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/forum/vi ... .php?t=103
Also current laws do not allow us to name the spineless ones.

Please do not name any individuals on here,use their 'work title' or 'my/a colleague' ect instead.

And people who aren't in a union. That's the original meaning I understand.tyconuk wrote:That's the problem
We had the same at our office this morning!
had about 3 go sick today!
But who can say, whether they are genuine or not.
I don't think you should call them strike breakers!
strike breakers are members of a union, who go against the union, aren't they!
peterpiper wrote:J**************************************, ALL WENT SICK THIS MORNING THIS IS NOT SUPPORT AND EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW IT THEY WORK IN WOOLTON LIVERPOOL
postie28 wrote:peterpiper wrote:J**************************************, ALL WENT SICK THIS MORNING THIS IS NOT SUPPORT AND EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW IT THEY WORK IN WOOLTON LIVERPOOL
shelly wrote:postie28 wrote:peterpiper wrote:J**************************************, ALL WENT SICK THIS MORNING THIS IS NOT SUPPORT AND EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW IT THEY WORK IN WOOLTON LIVERPOOL
know what you're getting at. but if people are skint and dont feel they can afford to strike isn't it better they pulled a sickie than go into work ?[/quote
NO NO. AND NO
john morrison wrote:kick all strike breakers out of the union,striking is not an option it is mandatory,anyone not on strike is a free loader,we all have bills to pay,i am looking forward to beans on toast for christmas dinner,should be nice served with a sprig of holly.