So, the results are in from the ‘shares for rights’ vote yesterday.
We’ve crunched the numbers for you, so you can see how your MP voted, and how many from each Party voted for and against.
277 of our MPs voted YES to ‘shares for rights’.
239 MPs voted NO.
There’s more detail below, but although we did not win this vote (don’t forget, the Tory-led Coalition has a built-in majority in the House of Commons) we did see 3 Lib Dems rebel, and all the smaller Parties in the House of Commons vote against this ‘shares for rights’ plan. That’s a testament to the hard work campaigners put in to lobbying their MPs to vote against this foolish plan.
Read more...
http://www.unionstogether.org.uk/blog/e ... e_numbers/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Shares for rights: crunching the numbers
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32784
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Shares for rights: crunching the numbers
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
the deliverer
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 14 May 2009, 19:34
- Gender: Male