Letter to Branches
No. 13LTB203
Ref: TK/lh
Date: 28th March 2013
To: All Branches
Dear Colleague
CWU Accounts 2012
Please find attached the CWU Accounts for 2012.
We are now able to publish these accounts following their full and detailed audit by our professional auditors Chantrey Vellacott DFK.
Branches are now invited to submit questions on this set of accounts. Questions must be addressed to the Senior Deputy General Secretary and received by no later than 17.00 on the 12th April 2013. Questions may be sent by e-mail but must be addressed to sdgs@cwu.org (Please note any emails or letters sent to any other email address or addressee will not be dealt with).
Responses to questions will be circulated to Branches in advance of CWU Annual Conference 2013.
Tony Kearns
Senior Deputy General Secretary
Attachment 1 at link http://www.cwu.org/ltb203/13-cwu-accounts-2012.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
CWU Accounts 2012
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72719
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
CWU Accounts 2012
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
Well I can't open it - d'you think they're stalling or hiding something - I just get the option to make the pdf logo largerTrueBlueTerrier wrote:Letter to Branches
No. 13LTB203
Ref: TK/lh
Date: 28th March 2013
To: All Branches
Dear Colleague
CWU Accounts 2012
Please find attached the CWU Accounts for 2012.
We are now able to publish these accounts following their full and detailed audit by our professional auditors Chantrey Vellacott DFK.
Branches are now invited to submit questions on this set of accounts. Questions must be addressed to the Senior Deputy General Secretary and received by no later than 17.00 on the 12th April 2013. Questions may be sent by e-mail but must be addressed to sdgs@cwu.org (Please note any emails or letters sent to any other email address or addressee will not be dealt with).
Responses to questions will be circulated to Branches in advance of CWU Annual Conference 2013.
Tony Kearns
Senior Deputy General Secretary
Attachment 1 at link http://www.cwu.org/ltb203/13-cwu-accounts-2012.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72719
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
Strange, I just redownloaded it and opened it fine no problems.
I didn't attach it as we pay the CWU and not Postman dues so I was trying to save his bandwidth.
I didn't attach it as we pay the CWU and not Postman dues so I was trying to save his bandwidth.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32784
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
I can't access it either.
You can put it on teebs,we've plenty of bandwith.
You can put it on teebs,we've plenty of bandwith.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
I'll have my usual gripe now re CWU finances...
Today it's the political fund.
Members were told that the political fund had to be increased from 10p to 20p in order for the union to remain an "effective campaigning organisation-Billy Hayes".
The revenue for the political fund in 2011 was £881,185 and the spend was £822,586 leaving a surplus of £58,599.
To me that's pretty reasonable financial management...around 6% underspend.
This year with the increase in members subs the revenue was £1,663,041
but the spend was still £876,336 leaving a ridiculous surplus of £786,705.
Why double the political levy if we didn't need it Billy?
Money is tight for members,I don't think they appreciate the CWU hoarding it.
Today it's the political fund.
Members were told that the political fund had to be increased from 10p to 20p in order for the union to remain an "effective campaigning organisation-Billy Hayes".
The revenue for the political fund in 2011 was £881,185 and the spend was £822,586 leaving a surplus of £58,599.
To me that's pretty reasonable financial management...around 6% underspend.
This year with the increase in members subs the revenue was £1,663,041
Why double the political levy if we didn't need it Billy?
Money is tight for members,I don't think they appreciate the CWU hoarding it.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
Should have reposted - managed to get it - couldn't manage to wade through it though and didn't understand what I did read - but you know the old saying "if at first you don't succeed f*ck it off".
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
Well it may be money set aside for Labours Election campaign - you know how influential Billy has been in the pastfishtank wrote:This year with the increase in members subs the revenue was £1,663,041but the spend was still £876,336 leaving a ridiculous surplus of £786,705.Why double the political levy if we didn't need it Billy?
Money is tight for members,I don't think they appreciate the CWU hoarding it.
-
silly suffolk
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 728
- Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
- Gender: Male
- Location: deepest suffolk
Re: CWU Accounts 2012
thanks for making this accessable fishtank. at times of austerity we seem pretty bloody well off. i agree with the comment of the taxmans obsession with a trade union, when others are ignored.fishtank wrote: