ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Roy Mayall
Posts: 236
Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 16:46
Gender: Male

The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Post by Roy Mayall »

Image

At the Royal Mail you are sometimes made to come into work even when you are sick or injured. It’s called the ‘Attendance Procedure’.

Latest from Roy Mayall.

Read more here: http://roymayall.wordpress.com/2012/11/ ... procedure/
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

Re: The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Post by silly suffolk »

gone sick me self today, me bloody back. but to be fair to the old firm they'll still pay me. many a employee out in the real world will get jack for the first 3 days. credit where credits due.
pinstripe
Posts: 2474
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Post by pinstripe »

Interesting article which raises a good question.

As our 'managers' act like robots, the computer says this so it will be so, where is the need for line managers? Just replace them with a coffee machine which prints out the pre-determined result of the back to work interview/stage warning. If we can get one with a sound chip installed to broadcast "sorters up!" RM will save thousands.
Poorly
Posts: 46
Joined: 05 Nov 2012, 20:34
Gender: Female

Re: The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Post by Poorly »

There are a lot of inaccuracies in that article, bit poor really.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Poorly wrote:There are a lot of inaccuracies in that article, bit poor really.
2 is hardly a lot.

Ok he got the 3 weeks wrong for the 1st stage its 4 absences or 14 days.

As to the "Three weeks off twice in a year, and you’re up for dismissal " , I think thats just a simple misunderstanding or more likely an attempt to explain a complicated process to outsiders . If you did have 2 absences of 3 weeks in one year then your next absence is likely to trigger a stage 3, of which dismissal is a possibility. Taking it the other way 42 days absence in a year with no "Fit note" is certainly enough for a stage 3. So I think his explanation, which is aimed at Joe public not Posties, although technically wrong, was a method of simplifying the point to make it more readable.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Poorly
Posts: 46
Joined: 05 Nov 2012, 20:34
Gender: Female

Re: The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Post by Poorly »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Poorly wrote:There are a lot of inaccuracies in that article, bit poor really.
2 is hardly a lot.
I counted 12. More inaccuracies than accuracies.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: The Royal Mail Attendance Procedure

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Poorly wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Poorly wrote:There are a lot of inaccuracies in that article, bit poor really.
2 is hardly a lot.
I counted 12. More inaccuracies than accuracies.
Any chance of posting the inaccuracies and what they should be - this is an honest request as it will help everyone understand the procedure that much better, especially those like me who are not reps.

Many thanks in anticipation.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.