ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

CWU ANNUAL CONFERENCE MONITORING 2012

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

CWU ANNUAL CONFERENCE MONITORING 2012

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Letter to Branches





No. 407/12
Ref: GS 1.1
Date: 29 May 2012






To: All Branches





Dear Colleague

CWU ANNUAL CONFERENCE MONITORING 2012

The CWU National Executive Council meeting – held on Tuesday 29th May 2012 – received a report from the General Secretary on the outcome of conference monitoring.

The information was garnered by the Regional Secretaries with the support of the Branches.

The NEC was of the view that the material should be circulated to CWU Branches.

Monitoring of conference was restarted at this year’s conference. The results are attached in the form of a summary by region – branch returns are attached separately. For comparison sake, the most recent previous results are attached covering the period 2003 to 2007.

The main thing to note in the 2012 results is the continuing under representation of women, BAME members and young members. Women delegates made up 13.84% at the Conference of 2003 – and 15.67% in 2012. The actual proportion to membership is 20%. In 2006 and 2007 there were a higher proportion of women as delegates. So progress appears to have been halted here.

BAME members made up 3.17% of the conference delegates in 2003 and 5.56% in 2012.

The estimated number of BAME members in the Union would be at least 10%. Again in 2006 and 2007, a higher proportion of delegates came from BAME members than in 2012. Again progress seems to be halted again.








________________________________________________________________


Approximately 11.5% of our current membership is young members (ie under 30 years old). Previously there was no monitoring of their attendance. So this year’s figure of 5.56% of attendance is an indication of under representation here also.

We have no real benchmark of the estimated number of disabled members of the CWU. Hence it is not possible to talk of proportionality. But we note in 2003, 7.62% were disabled, compared to 6% in 2012.

There were some notable failures at conference. But we should be encouraged by the fact that 13% were first timers.

The conference figures will form part of the platform for the discussions with Branches and Regions in the implementation of Proposition 67 from the 2011 Conference.

Any comments on this LTB should be addressed to the General Secretary to arrive no later than noon, Monday 25th June.


Yours sincerely




W HAYES
General Secretary
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.