ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Backless Frames

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Backless Frames

Post by dvbuk55 »

Backless frames are going in this weekend at my office. Has anyone had any experience of them and how succesful they are in comparison to the old system. Apparently we are only using the sorters, no porters because there is insufficient staff to take off the IPS/double prep so you still collect your own mail, after you've finished IPS................so no change except instead of collecting from the front you collect from the back.......................so instead of going round the back to pull your mail out you would imagine it would be simpler to pull it from the front......................still someone must be making money from it.
fng
Posts: 462
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 16:54
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by fng »

It works alright to be honest in my opinion. Before it was a case of leaning over some sweaty fat sorter (no offence to sweaty fat sorters) who huffed and puffed at you for making him go even slower than he was already.

Now just nip between the frames and grab the mail from the back the sorters can carry on doing their job unhinded.
Tripitaka: "You should live without fear. There's as much chance of good things as bad things."
Sandy: "It's a cheerful philosophy and I've heard it from people before. They're all dead now."
Monkey "Excuse me when I say, that you really are extraordinarily dim!"
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by fishtank »

That seems a bit pointless DV...no porters.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: Backless Frames

Post by Stormproof »

We are going to have backless frames aswell. I heard the best sorters will be on the IPS the rest will be porters, so thats 2 sorters and 98 porters then :dance
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by fishtank »

Stormproof wrote:We are going to have backless frames aswell. I heard the best sorters will be on the IPS the rest will be porters, so thats 2 sorters and 98 porters then :dance
No Storm...the 2 are Supersorters or Sorting Champions or some other s**t like that.
The other 98 of us are potential IHR/NCI/Dismissal cases. :wave
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:That seems a bit pointless DV...no porters.
I thought the whole point was to have porters, hence the backless frame but it seems to be more a question of seeming to toe a collective line even though we cannot implement portering, we cannot fit in the D2D cupboards because there is insufficient room - so the end result is backless frames full stop. Ain't life grand :chuckle

Makes you wonder if the whole issue of new frames, more vehicles, CSS machines et al what the value of colleague shares would have been? I imagine a room of RM boffins, or do I mean buffoons, sitting round a table thinking of ways to spend money to avoid giving the plebs any.
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: Backless Frames

Post by Stormproof »

dvbuk55 wrote:
fishtank wrote:I imagine a room of RM boffins, or do I mean buffoons, sitting round a table thinking of ways to spend money to avoid giving the plebs any.
That reminds me of a parcel we once had in the Callers office for one of the area directors. They had sent off for some hats Image
No wonder this firm is in the state its in.
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by fishtank »

I think this is how it went down DV.
Someone in RM Procurement got their hands on a shipment of cheap IPS frames meaning to simply replace the old ones.
Obviously the reason they were so cheap was because someone had forgotten to fit the back panel.
Rather than look foolish...again....a desperate attempt at face saving was needed and after a "Blue Sky" brainstorming session someone was despatched to B&Q to source as much bungie cord as possible.
The backless frame was born.... :cuppa
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
pinstripe
Posts: 2474
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: Backless Frames

Post by pinstripe »

We had them installed against the advice of the union. They argued that there was insufficient space for them, the use and training of 'porters' had not been properly addressed and that they were a waste of money.

They were installed on a Sunday, Monday morning came and it was a disaster. No porters, no-one allowed to go down the backs of the frames due to H&S, staff clearing in over the top of the sorters, mail flying back out of the slots because of the elastic bands on the back, even less space in the office than before. We ended up with the Area H&S rep down and he wasn't impressed. Now the space between the 2 rows of backless frames is used to store the yorks of M/S. Oh, and both letters and flats are sorted into the same slots, so clearing down is a nightmare. I can see why RM love them.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:I think this is how it went down DV.
Someone in RM Procurement got their hands on a shipment of cheap IPS frames meaning to simply replace the old ones.
Obviously the reason they were so cheap was because someone had forgotten to fit the back panel.
Rather than look foolish...again....a desperate attempt at face saving was needed and after a "Blue Sky" brainstorming session someone was despatched to B&Q to source as much bungie cord as possible.
The backless frame was born.... :cuppa
That sounds a bit sleazy to be honest ft...................RM Procurement :hmmmm I have visions of East Europeans, shady deals in cafes :nervous

Reminds me of my dad, he was on a trip to London and was offered some nice white shirts, packaged and some named brand at the time. He bought two thinking he would wear one on the journey back................got back to the hotel, opened the box and the shirts had no sleeves, just ragged edges...................he never forgave the cockney spivs, although it was a source of amusement for many years - he died 40 years ago.
woofwoof
Posts: 1516
Joined: 13 Apr 2007, 16:23
Gender: Male
Location: stinky land

Re: Backless Frames

Post by woofwoof »

search for indoor flow
NewPostieUK
Posts: 2104
Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 21:38
Gender: Male
Location: SickAsAChipLand

Re: Backless Frames

Post by NewPostieUK »

It's too hard to pull the stuff out, from either back or front! We have no porters either, and the bungee straps make it hard to pull the stuff out the back, especially the top and bottom, most people still go round the front. The slots are too shallow, you can't get your hand in to get a good grip of the letters.
taurus88
Posts: 1259
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 17:53
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by taurus88 »

They're w**k, in my humble opinion. No improvement on the previous. You have to fight through bungee cords to get your mail now. Sounds easy but saves nothing at any point. 95% of staff still go round the front anyway instead of having to fight through the bungees to get their mail. Although, by the time I get to work, there's usually no-one on IPS, anyway. So I just grab from the front.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16688
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Backless Frames

Post by clashcityrocker »

The backless frames are smaller - meaning after sorting 3 British Medical Journals or just one Red the box needs to be cleared.
If they say you need one porter, you will really need at least 3.
They're not the slickest bit of kit in the DO.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12175
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Backless Frames

Post by SpacePhoenix »

pinstripe wrote:We had them installed against the advice of the union. They argued that there was insufficient space for them, the use and training of 'porters' had not been properly addressed and that they were a waste of money.

They were installed on a Sunday, Monday morning came and it was a disaster. No porters, no-one allowed to go down the backs of the frames due to H&S, staff clearing in over the top of the sorters, mail flying back out of the slots because of the elastic bands on the back, even less space in the office than before. We ended up with the Area H&S rep down and he wasn't impressed. Now the space between the 2 rows of backless frames is used to store the yorks of M/S. Oh, and both letters and flats are sorted into the same slots, so clearing down is a nightmare. I can see why RM love them.
You may as well move them together and close that space up as very soon mailsort won't arrive at MCs until the day before it's due to be deleivered.

Think of it this way your clearing down the frames more often and each time a slot is cleared you're probably having to stop sorting for a few moments. All that time will add up meaning you'll probably get off the IPS later, so get tied up later and depending on time have a bit less time to deliver it so increases the chances of people having to cut-off.