ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Revision:Rurals

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Gingertompkins
Posts: 2
Joined: 05 Apr 2012, 21:15
Gender: Male

Revision:Rurals

Post by Gingertompkins »

We have just been told that that our rural duties will not be revised by georoute but instead will go through a "tabletop" revision which leaves them open to interpretation. Is this happening nationwide or is this a local issue?
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Revision:Rurals

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Gingertompkins wrote:We have just been told that that our rural duties will not be revised by georoute but instead will go through a "tabletop" revision which leaves them open to interpretation. Is this happening nationwide or is this a local issue?
Bit of both, in that it is being done nationally as in all over the country but is not universal. Rather they generally do table tops as a stop gap before another revision, or because there are not enough planners available.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16683
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Revision:Rurals

Post by clashcityrocker »

I didn't think Georoute could do rurals.
That was the big f**k up in South West Scotland.
It doesn't let you turn right - or am I getting confused?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Gingertompkins
Posts: 2
Joined: 05 Apr 2012, 21:15
Gender: Male

Re: Revision:Rurals

Post by Gingertompkins »

Is it possible that this is due to Georoute not giving RM the outcome they desired and they have decided to go down the tabletop route as it gives them a better opportunity to fabricate the results that they seek. One of the more disturbing aspects of this is that despite the length of time that has been spent on this revision and with less than 10 weeks until implementation, this week was the first time that the tabletop issue has been mentioned. It is also disapointing to note that our area union rep has not questioned this and appears to be happy to go down this road.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Revision:Rurals

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Gingertompkins wrote:Is it possible that this is due to Georoute not giving RM the outcome they desired and they have decided to go down the tabletop route as it gives them a better opportunity to fabricate the results that they seek.
Its a possibility.
Gingertompkins wrote:It is also disapointing to note that our area union rep has not questioned this and appears to be happy to go down this road.
Could be a good sign. Table top revisions can be both the worst idea and the best idea, it all depends on circumstances. Not knowing your ADR I can't make a personal judgement but if it was my ADR and he had full involvement with input from duty holders I would be okay with it.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.