ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Fuel strike

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
heathrow86
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 136
Joined: 22 Oct 2008, 11:23
Gender: Male

Fuel strike

Post by heathrow86 »

Nothing to do with the Royal Mail, but can we have the Unite union represent us intead of the CWU. I mean someone like Len McCluskey? At least he is standing up to the employers.
parcelboy
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 206
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 17:41
Gender: Male

Re: Fuel strike

Post by parcelboy »

heathrow86 wrote:Nothing to do with the Royal Mail, but can we have the Unite union represent us intead of the CWU. I mean someone like Len McCluskey? At least he is standing up to the employers.
Back to bikes if they havent scrapped them :dance
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Fuel strike

Post by Martin Walsh »

Is this the same unite which the CMA are part of and supported us so well during the 2009 strikes ? Or the same union who resolve the British Airways dispute so well and so quickly.

Unite is a political union and not really an industrial union whereas the CWU have proven track record of fighting issues in Royal Mail. For example Unite let Royal Mail take away MTSF terms for all managers whereas all CWU members have still got MTSF terms.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Fuel strike

Post by DGP1 »

Even though I'm one of the unions biggest critics I in no way want that bunch of management supporting tossers anywhere near our terms and conditions, the CWU gives away enough without them giving away everything.

As for the fuel drivers strike..............without knowing all the details or the actual dispute all I can say is it's much easier to resolve it through talk than to up the stakes and cause a real screw up (just like what's happening now with the Government prepared to use the army as strike breakers).

Plus, driving around with 30,000 litres of an explosive liquid in the back is not what I class as a safe career, if anything I want more H&S, less speed and bigger margins for error than the supposed cutting of H&S and corners just to try to atain unrealistic targets.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Fuel strike

Post by fishtank »

Unite isn't one union it's an amalgamation of many.
You can't label it crap on the actions of the CMA just like you can't call it a fighting union on the actions of the fuel drivers.
You wouldn't,for example label the CWU a fighting union based on how it represents it's BT employees.
I was still in short trousers the last time BT had a national strike.
I have no real issues with Unite nor am i desperate to join them although if the CWU can't stop falling membership levels and cut spending i might not have any choice.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Fuel strike

Post by Martin Walsh »

The problem with unite is what you said it is an amalgamation of unions and therefore local disputes and their cost are not always supported in the way they should be. if we ever did merge or get taken over by unite then we will never see a national strike again and Branch's do not have a rebate instead you bid for things centrally .
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Fuel strike

Post by dvbuk55 »

dingo wrote:The problem with unite is what you said it is an amalgamation of unions and therefore local disputes and their cost are not always supported in the way they should be. if we ever did merge or get taken over by unite then we will never see a national strike again and Branch's do not have a rebate instead you bid for things centrally .
Who's to say change is not good? Perhaps it may regalvanise some into thinking that they need to work harder on our behalf, and look to the financial management of the union in a new light. Maybe a new set of rules enabling leadership and representation to be judged on performance and appropriate action taken.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Fuel strike

Post by Martin Walsh »

DVbuk you can trail it by joining Unite and the CMA section I am sure there be only to pleased to have you to add to their 9000 members. The CWUs loss will be unites gain.
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: Fuel strike

Post by Lounge Lizard »

DGP1 wrote:Even though I'm one of the unions biggest critics I in no way want that bunch of management supporting tossers anywhere near our terms and conditions, the CWU gives away enough without them giving away everything.

As for the fuel drivers strike..............without knowing all the details or the actual dispute all I can say is it's much easier to resolve it through talk than to up the stakes and cause a real screw up (just like what's happening now with the Government prepared to use the army as strike breakers).

Plus, driving around with 30,000 litres of an explosive liquid in the back is not what I class as a safe career, if anything I want more H&S, less speed and bigger margins for error than the supposed cutting of H&S and corners just to try to atain unrealistic targets.
"driving around with 30,000 litres of an explosive liquid in the back is not what I class as a safe career" :crazy: right, so how many of them have been burned to cinders over the last ten years, no doubt many less than posties that have topped themselves from bullying and harrassment from management. :sad:
Don't get taken in by all that bullshit from Unite. :sad:
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Fuel strike

Post by dvbuk55 »

dingo wrote:DVbuk you can trail it by joining Unite and the CMA section I am sure there be only to pleased to have you to add to their 9000 members. The CWUs loss will be unites gain.
Perhaps I'd go the whole hog dingo and TRIAL the whole unite family with a disputed reputed 2 million members....................in fact it's reported there are more unite members NOT paying their dues than actually belong to the CWU. However the 2 million is supposedly only 1.5 million so in round figures 10 times larger than the CWU. Could be a lesson to be learned there.................quite a number of lessons probably. :wave