https://www.myroyalmail.com/mrm/appnews ... aspx?i=679" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
We issued the following statement in response to TNT’s plans to trial a collection and delivery service in west London from mid April.(See competitors forum for news: http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 40&t=42933" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; )
Our statement
Royal Mail’s letters and parcels division - the business that provides the Universal Service - is loss-making and mail volumes continue to fall sharply.
If a rival service cherry picks profitable, easy-to-deliver mail, it will weaken and ultimately undermine the Universal Service that only Royal Mail currently has the ability and commitment to deliver to the UK’s 29 million addresses.
The Universal Service is the bedrock of the postal system.
It benefits every user of the post, whether they post a small number of birthday and Christmas cards or they are a large business posting millions of letters.
It means anyone can post a letter in any postbox at a flat-rate, affordable, uniform price and Royal Mail will take it on a journey of up to 800 miles regardless of the cost and complexity of the journey.
A service based on mail posted by a relatively small number of customers to a concentrated area of addresses with deliveries perhaps just two days a week is clearly targeting the profitable part of the overall mailbag.
Rivals also have the option of reposting into the Royal Mail network any mail they find too costly to deliver. Royal Mail believes that a rival service like the one announced today will benefit a relatively small number of customers in the short-term but it will be to the long-term disadvantage of postal customers everywhere.
Right balance
We have cautioned against unrestricted development of rival end-to-end services in a submission to Ofcom, published in February 2012. In that document, we said Ofcom must find the right balance between promoting competition and securing the Universal Service.
In it, we said: ‘Where the objective of securing the Universal Service and the promotion of competition comes into conflict, the Postal Services Act 2011 is clear that it is Ofcom’s duty to secure provision of the Universal Service, which takes precedent.’
Royal Mail is required by law to process and deliver its competitors’ mail. Elsewhere in the EU, access is overwhelmingly at the discretion of the Universal Service provider, subject only to commercial negotiation.
The current compulsory access regime guarantees the ability of Royal Mail’s competitors to undercut its prices. No other European Universal Service provider faces such a regime. Royal Mail supports fair competition but it does have serious concerns about any competing service that could weaken the Universal Service through cherry-picking.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
RM:Statement on TNT announcement
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32787
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
RM:Statement on TNT announcement
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
demon
- Posts: 732
- Joined: 08 Jul 2009, 14:19
- Gender: Female
Re: RM:Statement on TNT announcement
royal mail staff can to be cherry picked for the right price as we are all fed up with royal mails s**t
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: RM:Statement on TNT announcement
not sticking up for rm, but,,,,,you wont get anywhere near the 9 quid an hour off tnt. barely more than minimum wage i believe.demon wrote:royal mail staff can to be cherry picked for the right price as we are all fed up with royal mails s**t
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: RM:Statement on TNT announcement
daveyeff wrote:not sticking up for rm, but,,,,,you wont get anywhere near the 9 quid an hour off tnt. barely more than minimum wage i believe.demon wrote:royal mail staff can to be cherry picked for the right price as we are all fed up with royal mails s**t
We've got one on here due to start the trial in London.Pay would be £7.10 an hour. Basic under performing would be NMW only. Pay increases would be up to £8.10-50 and held there unless you get promoted of course. Get 28 days paid holiday each holiday year, statutory sick pay for more than 3 days, good pension scheme, Right allowance programme for travel if needed and get various bonuses also.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: RM:Statement on TNT announcement
saying that though they probably wont do d2d, or 4hrs 50mins delivery.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: RM:Statement on TNT announcement
also, we,re not on that money because rm thinks we should be, its because we,ve fought for it. for years and years.