ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

duty of care

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
stupidboy
Posts: 144
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 19:05
Gender: Male

duty of care

Post by stupidboy »

i just find it so ironic that RM's idea of 'duty of care' involves doing things that make a condition work. arthritic backs need to be kept mobile and supple so i get taken off of a delivery and made to sit around indoors doing not much for weeks until assessed by atos. crazy!
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: duty of care

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

stupidboy wrote:i just find it so ironic that RM's idea of 'duty of care' involves doing things that make a condition work. arthritic backs need to be kept mobile and supple so i get taken off of a delivery and made to sit around indoors doing not much for weeks until assessed by atos. crazy!

Sounds like the ideal situation for a "Fit note" from a GP, in fact isn't what you have described the raison d'etre of them. :hmmmm
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
jockmill
Posts: 1
Joined: 29 Feb 2012, 20:14
Gender: Male

Re: duty of care

Post by jockmill »

Im a manager for Royal Mail and most of the threads slag us off, I feel compeled to respond to yours i have been off work since last Sep with a herniated disk i was not removed from my duties which from time to time included deliveries, This made the situation worse for me. So ask yourself this whats your manager to do he/she is not medicaly qualified so he/she has to wait for a report from ATOS to ensure they take the correct action! Sounds like you have a manager who has listened to you and does not want to make any matters worse by sending you out on delivery.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: duty of care

Post by dvbuk55 »

jockmill wrote:Im a manager for Royal Mail and most of the threads slag us off, I feel compeled to respond to yours i have been off work since last Sep with a herniated disk i was not removed from my duties which from time to time included deliveries, This made the situation worse for me. So ask yourself this whats your manager to do he/she is not medicaly qualified so he/she has to wait for a report from ATOS to ensure they take the correct action! Sounds like you have a manager who has listened to you and does not want to make any matters worse by sending you out on delivery.
As you say jock, the manager is not medically qualified, so in the absence of information to the contrary why would the duty be changed, more especially if the person involved feels that it is detrimental to be sat around, which could make the condition worse.
stupidboy
Posts: 144
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 19:05
Gender: Male

Re: duty of care

Post by stupidboy »

dvbuk55 wrote:
jockmill wrote:Im a manager for Royal Mail and most of the threads slag us off, I feel compeled to respond to yours i have been off work since last Sep with a herniated disk i was not removed from my duties which from time to time included deliveries, This made the situation worse for me. So ask yourself this whats your manager to do he/she is not medicaly qualified so he/she has to wait for a report from ATOS to ensure they take the correct action! Sounds like you have a manager who has listened to you and does not want to make any matters worse by sending you out on delivery.
As you say jock, the manager is not medically qualified, so in the absence of information to the contrary why would the duty be changed, more especially if the person involved feels that it is detrimental to be sat around, which could make the condition worse.
the manager in question has a recent atos report stating what i can do, he has a letter from my specialist telling him i need to be kept mobile. this is not about my health its about finances and trying to get me ill health retired
blackadder
Posts: 584
Joined: 04 Jul 2007, 20:49
Location: deep south

Re: duty of care

Post by blackadder »

carrying a 16kg bag on your back aint going to help it is it. what kinda duty you after ??
the path of my life is strewn with cowpats from the devils own satanic herd
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: duty of care

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

blackadder wrote:carrying a 16kg bag on your back aint going to help it is it. what kinda duty you after ??
Correct. Therefore part of the reasonable adjustments would be to reduce the weight of each pouch.

The 16kg is maximum weight not a target weight, as an aside I think the heaviest I have taken out this week is 13.5kg.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
stupidboy
Posts: 144
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 19:05
Gender: Male

Re: duty of care

Post by stupidboy »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
blackadder wrote:carrying a 16kg bag on your back aint going to help it is it. what kinda duty you after ??
Correct. Therefore part of the reasonable adjustments would be to reduce the weight of each pouch.

The 16kg is maximum weight not a target weight, as an aside I think the heaviest I have taken out this week is 13.5kg.
thats exzctly what i was doing. amended duties with lighter bags,had it worked out and it was working fine until DOM decided he knew better and made the matter much worse