We are currently in the middle of a Revision and my rep is trying to find out what the correct ACF's are and to which level in the trays these are counted for Manual Large Letters and Manual Large DSA.
Any help would be great thanks in advance
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Container Fills
-
AnotherLimey
- Posts: 751
- Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:45
- Gender: Male
Re: Container Fills
I counted ACFs before christmas, DSA was around 200 per tray and normal letters around 250, RM will tell you they average around 157 
-
taxi4leighton
- Posts: 343
- Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 14:05
Re: Container Fills
the problem we have
is that many of the flat boxes have loads of letters in them
letters that arent being recorded
which leaves to IPS men on letters being accused of being to slow
even though they have sorted twice hte recorded figures
this has been happening for years
and despite protests. no improvement.
Also we find the boxes containing walk sequence mail are packed very tight
wonder if the figures for these are accurate
doubt it
you cant trust them
is that many of the flat boxes have loads of letters in them
letters that arent being recorded
which leaves to IPS men on letters being accused of being to slow
even though they have sorted twice hte recorded figures
this has been happening for years
and despite protests. no improvement.
Also we find the boxes containing walk sequence mail are packed very tight
wonder if the figures for these are accurate
doubt it
you cant trust them
-
Cut Off King
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 21:18
- Gender: Female
Re: Container Fills
NO need to worry, the CWU & RM are going to have a new trust & co-operation agreement, soon we'll all be on the same side....taxi4leighton wrote:the problem we have
is that many of the flat boxes have loads of letters in them
letters that arent being recorded
which leaves to IPS men on letters being accused of being to slow
even though they have sorted twice hte recorded figures
this has been happening for years
and despite protests. no improvement.
Also we find the boxes containing walk sequence mail are packed very tight
wonder if the figures for these are accurate
doubt it
you cant trust them
-
Red Robbo
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 680
- Joined: 31 Jan 2012, 09:23
- Gender: Male
Re: Container Fills
It would be best to ask your local Work Load Assessment manager, incidentally ACF is what it says "average container fill" these figures are national figures and cannot be changed locally.welshy808 wrote:We are currently in the middle of a Revision and my rep is trying to find out what the correct ACF's are and to which level in the trays these are counted for Manual Large Letters and Manual Large DSA.
Any help would be great thanks in advance
-
Lincox
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
- Gender: Male
Re: Container Fills
One figure suits all then
-
whatamess!!
- Posts: 279
- Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 17:43
- Gender: Female
Re: Container Fills
You do have a local figure! it won't be right but thats another story. 
-
haddie
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 20 Mar 2011, 09:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Container Fills
there was an update in january this year
-
PhilthyPhil
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: 23 Nov 2007, 19:15
Re: Container Fills
The mixed trays of letters and flats are probably those sorted on the TOPS2000 machine in the MC so the traffic will be recorded accuratly. Same goes for sequenced mail. How much mail in a tray is irrelevent for machine sorted mail as it counts how much mail goes through the machine to each selection not number of trays.taxi4leighton wrote:the problem we have
is that many of the flat boxes have loads of letters in them
letters that arent being recorded
which leaves to IPS men on letters being accused of being to slow
even though they have sorted twice hte recorded figures
this has been happening for years
and despite protests. no improvement.
Also we find the boxes containing walk sequence mail are packed very tight
wonder if the figures for these are accurate
doubt it
you cant trust them