ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

The IWT tool. Anyone got a copy?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
mandelsons_toenail
Posts: 1294
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:16
Gender: Male
Location: Outer Hebrides

The IWT tool. Anyone got a copy?

Post by mandelsons_toenail »

:Very Happy

I know its a long shot

But the IWT program that I dont trust is simply an excel program right>?

Now I used to be quite tasty with excel in my uni days pre royal mail.

If anyone happens to have a copy, not that I can see how, all we'd have to do is disect it and prove its a lying sack of s**t by all of the formulas etc,

it struck me as i was in a meeting the other week, when a manager :shock: was giving a demonstration
keithposty
Posts: 918
Joined: 22 Feb 2011, 11:44
Gender: Male

Re: The IWT tool. Anyone got a copy?

Post by keithposty »

the iwt program is linked into sid and sara

that is the data that is supplied into the aplus

please, please make sure you have accurate packet and parcel counts for each walk, get the guys to be honest how long the delivery takes, thats the correct way, not by short cuts.

get a copy of the TM1 TO BEGIN WITH

question and keep questioning the data and dont be afraid to go into disagreement, i have three outstanding at the moment and dont sign off any phases without the area rep in attendance

they will not give you a copy of the program, only look at it.
any problems just ask as i am quite far ahead with my revision and i know all the cons
Glenno
Posts: 1491
Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 13:12

Re: The IWT tool. Anyone got a copy?

Post by Glenno »

Here is an old copy Version 6, and it has not been populated :wave :wave
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
keithposty
Posts: 918
Joined: 22 Feb 2011, 11:44
Gender: Male

Re: The IWT tool. Anyone got a copy?

Post by keithposty »

Glenno wrote:Here is an old copy Version 6, and it has not been populated :wave :wave

are they not using version 7 now