ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

work place coach

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

work place coach

Post by silly suffolk »

we have a work place coach in place, who was selected by a manager 12 month's ago. there were several applicants for the post and as it returns a financial reward they want a reselection for the coming year. i wondered if this happens elsewhere or is the coaches post an earner for life?
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16679
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: work place coach

Post by clashcityrocker »

I think it is a job for life unless they voluntarily give it up or there are questions about their competency.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: work place coach

Post by fishtank »

Who wants a reselection and why suffolk?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

Re: work place coach

Post by silly suffolk »

fishtank wrote:Who wants a reselection and why suffolk?
money. its 30 quid a week and percieved as doing jack for it.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: work place coach

Post by fishtank »

silly suffolk wrote:
fishtank wrote:Who wants a reselection and why suffolk?
money. its 30 quid a week and percieved as doing jack for it.
It isn't up for grabs in a duty selection.
It's a management assigned job so unless the current WPC gives it up or is no longer capable or willing to perform the role it stays where it is.
There is an agreement that backs it up. http://www.cwu.org/assets/_files/docume ... tion_T.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:neutral:
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

Re: work place coach

Post by silly suffolk »

fishtank wrote:
silly suffolk wrote:
fishtank wrote:Who wants a reselection and why suffolk?
money. its 30 quid a week and percieved as doing jack for it.
It isn't up for grabs in a duty selection.
It's a management assigned job so unless the current WPC gives it up or is no longer capable or willing to perform the role it stays where it is.
There is an agreement that backs it up. http://www.cwu.org/assets/_files/docume ... tion_T.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:neutral:
thanks fish, it looks like the other hopefuls will have to stir the muck with the manager to try and shift him, but i can't see it happening. it doesn't help that the incumbent coach is on ex phg's allowance. when time's get tough one individual earning £50 a week more cause's strife. thats life i suppose.
jmcg
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 147
Joined: 14 Jul 2010, 15:50
Gender: Male

Re: work place coach

Post by jmcg »

workplace coaches serve no useful purpose whatsoever...its that simple. :confused
pink panther
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 151
Joined: 09 Feb 2011, 14:15
Gender: Male

Re: work place coach

Post by pink panther »

most of them are blue eyes.
smartbhoy
Posts: 93
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 14:54
Gender: Male

Re: work place coach

Post by smartbhoy »

So really in your office Suffolk, you or/and a lot of the members just want him ousted for financial gain.
Talk about stabbing someone in the back, all because he receives an allowance or two. soladarity and all that.
Is it serious assualt or GBH from certain people in your office if you do some OT that they usually do???
I hope he puts a grievance in for bully/harrassment against any member who starts a campaign to get him ousted. Because that's exactly what it will be.

As for you Panther "Most are blue eyes" ?? I'm assuming you mean MOST workplace coaches do something favourably for manangement and are given preferential treatment in EVERY office ??
Can you back that up with evidence? Statements from members regarding all workplace coaches in every office in the UK??

I'm a workplace coach, Panther and i'm far from being a so called "Blue eyed boy".
I was chosen (no one else wanted to do it) by the management to fill this role.
For the £30 and pennies allowance a week, i do nothing. Why? Because DOMS & DLMS think they can do everything themselves and don't need my input.
If that's what they want, so be it. I shall take the allowance and do as i'm asked.
johnnyp
Posts: 5239
Joined: 27 Jan 2007, 16:00
Gender: Male
Location: SE ENGLAND

Re: work place coach

Post by johnnyp »

pink panther wrote:most of them are blue eyes.

Mine are Brown :wave
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

Re: work place coach

Post by silly suffolk »

smartbhoy wrote:So really in your office Suffolk, you or/and a lot of the members just want him ousted for financial gain.
Talk about stabbing someone in the back, all because he receives an allowance or two. soladarity and all that.
Is it serious assualt or GBH from certain people in your office if you do some OT that they usually do???
I hope he puts a grievance in for bully/harrassment against any member who starts a campaign to get him ousted. Because that's exactly what it will be.

As for you Panther "Most are blue eyes" ?? I'm assuming you mean MOST workplace coaches do something favourably for manangement and are given preferential treatment in EVERY office ??
Can you back that up with evidence? Statements from members regarding all workplace coaches in every office in the UK??

I'm a workplace coach, Panther and i'm far from being a so called "Blue eyed boy".
I was chosen (no one else wanted to do it) by the management to fill this role.
For the £30 and pennies allowance a week, i do nothing. Why? Because DOMS & DLMS think they can do everything themselves and don't need my input.
If that's what they want, so be it. I shall take the allowance and do as i'm asked.
i said the perception was the coach didn't do anything, and also there were several candidates for the coaches posistion last year. i personally believe our coach do's a good job, but who's to say some one else wouldn't be as good? as they say, no jobs for life now.
roger
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 148
Joined: 17 Feb 2007, 18:51

Re: work place coach

Post by roger »

silly suffolk wrote:
smartbhoy wrote:So really in your office Suffolk, you or/and a lot of the members just want him ousted for financial gain.
Talk about stabbing someone in the back, all because he receives an allowance or two. soladarity and all that.
Is it serious assualt or GBH from certain people in your office if you do some OT that they usually do???
I hope he puts a grievance in for bully/harrassment against any member who starts a campaign to get him ousted. Because that's exactly what it will be.

As for you Panther "Most are blue eyes" ?? I'm assuming you mean MOST workplace coaches do something favourably for manangement and are given preferential treatment in EVERY office ??
Can you back that up with evidence? Statements from members regarding all workplace coaches in every office in the UK??

I'm a workplace coach, Panther and i'm far from being a so called "Blue eyed boy".
I was chosen (no one else wanted to do it) by the management to fill this role.
For the £30 and pennies allowance a week, i do nothing. Why? Because DOMS & DLMS think they can do everything themselves and don't need my input.
If that's what they want, so be it. I shall take the allowance and do as i'm asked.
i said the perception was the coach didn't do anything, and also there were several candidates for the coaches posistion last year. i personally believe our coach do's a good job, but who's to say some one else wouldn't be as good? as they say, no jobs for life now.
As a workplace coach is classed as a specialist duty and has a selection process to fill it,and as a specialist duty it does not need to go into a re-sign the person holding that duty can hold it for life as long as the duty exists.
not me
Posts: 2735
Joined: 10 Aug 2007, 15:07
Gender: Female
Location: Uranus

Re: work place coach

Post by not me »

smartbhoy wrote:So really in your office Suffolk, you or/and a lot of the members just want him ousted for financial gain.
Talk about stabbing someone in the back, all because he receives an allowance or two. soladarity and all that.
Is it serious assualt or GBH from certain people in your office if you do some OT that they usually do???
I hope he puts a grievance in for bully/harrassment against any member who starts a campaign to get him ousted. Because that's exactly what it will be.

As for you Panther "Most are blue eyes" ?? I'm assuming you mean MOST workplace coaches do something favourably for manangement and are given preferential treatment in EVERY office ??
Can you back that up with evidence? Statements from members regarding all workplace coaches in every office in the UK??

I'm a workplace coach, Panther and i'm far from being a so called "Blue eyed boy".
I was chosen (no one else wanted to do it) by the management to fill this role.
For the £30 and pennies allowance a week, i do nothing. Why? Because DOMS & DLMS think they can do everything themselves and don't need my input.
If that's what they want, so be it. I shall take the allowance and do as i'm asked.

isnt that the crux of the issue?
its a pointless position
rather have more staff than you getting cash for doing cock all
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: work place coach

Post by fishtank »

Most people on here moan about people not doing the job properly.
What better opportunity to teach new starts right from the beginning how to do the job by the book,where the union rep is,how to join the union,what managers can and can't get away with and how to stand up for yourself than have a decent workplace coach.

The problem is many offices have a useless workplace coach.
It's not the position that's pointless...it's a lot of the people in post who are.
The union missed a trick on this,they should have demanded input in the recruiting process.
It's an organisational goldmine waiting to be tapped for them,if we had union sympathisers instead of too many management pets the role we would increase membership in a big way and help to strengthen an office.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72716
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: work place coach

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

fishtank wrote:Most people on here moan about people not doing the job properly.
What better opportunity to teach new starts right from the beginning how to do the job by the book,where the union rep is,how to join the union,what managers can and can't get away with and how to stand up for yourself than have a decent workplace coach.

The problem is many offices have a useless workplace coach.
It's not the position that's pointless...it's a lot of the people in post who are.
The union missed a trick on this,they should have demanded input in the recruiting process.
It's an organisational goldmine waiting to be tapped for them,if we had union sympathisers instead of too many management pets the role we would increase membership in a big way and help to strengthen an office.
I have said this before and I'll say it again - our WPC is excellent, he is all that Fishtank has described in what you want for a good one. :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause He also does as many duties as he can so that he knows what the people he trains will face. Good work old chap. :Very Happy
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.