ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Tieing Up Backwards

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
BillyPosty
Posts: 237
Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 13:12
Gender: Male

Tieing Up Backwards

Post by BillyPosty »

I'm on a new round and the fitting is very strange for 2x streets. You start at 1 and end at 2 as normal, but the fitting goes 52 - 2, 37 - 1. Today I had to have the bundle upside down (addresses down) and turn the letters over as I walked as I didn't know. To tie them up properly is there any way other than pulling each house out backwards one by one?
TeeferTiger
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2783
Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 13:56
Gender: Female
Location: Welsh Wales

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by TeeferTiger »

cross over the road? :chuckle
Does this rag smell of chloroform to you?
BillyPosty
Posts: 237
Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 13:12
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by BillyPosty »

Hehe, no you can't do that because it would still all be face down :shock: Even if you start at the other end of the street you would still end up doing it wrong.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72725
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Thats a BACKED street

According to your post take out the evens, then turn the bundle over so the letters are lying face down. Then take the odd numbers in order, and put them face up on the evens.

If done correctly 1 side is evens the other is odds. Then when out on delivery you zig zag down the street (Turning the bundle over as you go). The only other way is to pull it out in the order you will be delivering, but you'll have to have a good memory to do that.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by fishtank »

Once you have a delivery methods revision this will be very rare.
Back to backing with a trolley isn't very clever.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
BillyPosty
Posts: 237
Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 13:12
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by BillyPosty »

Thanks for that - I see what you mean now. It's a bit clumsy though, they'd be better changing the fitting really. I'll try it tomrrow though!
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72725
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Sime83 wrote:Thanks for that - I see what you mean now. It's a bit clumsy though, they'd be better changing the fitting really. I'll try it tomrrow though!
It is a little clumsy but it saves dead walking back to the beginning. It also feels a bit slower when your doing it but it takes about the same time, very useful here in Huddersfield where we have hills, no point in climbing up one when you can avoid it. :Very Happy
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
BillyPosty
Posts: 237
Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 13:12
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by BillyPosty »

Yes I bet it is! I'll give it a try tomorrow - hopefully I wont drop them all in the street :crazy:
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by fishtank »

Sime83 wrote:Yes I bet it is! I'll give it a try tomorrow - hopefully I wont drop them all in the street :crazy:
Be careful though.
Back to back is only for quiet streets.
I once saw a manager playing frogger on a main street.
It was hilarious. :chuckle
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72725
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

fishtank wrote:
Sime83 wrote:Yes I bet it is! I'll give it a try tomorrow - hopefully I wont drop them all in the street :crazy:
Be careful though.
Back to back is only for quiet streets.
I once saw a manager playing frogger on a main street.
It was hilarious. :chuckle
Our last revision plan had someone backing a dual carriageway :crazy:
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
kawoxux
Posts: 300
Joined: 18 Aug 2011, 19:36
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by kawoxux »

Why not make the frame in order with the back to back in place.. ie..

57, 55, 53, 56, 54, 52, 51, 49, 47, 50, 48, 46.. etc.

Saves the turning round and won't confuse when someones new to the frame, like this has. Might be a bit confusing to prep, but not that much (all the 50s are the same area, all the 40s, etc..)
Blue29
Posts: 223
Joined: 22 Jun 2011, 10:24
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by Blue29 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
fishtank wrote:
Sime83 wrote:Yes I bet it is! I'll give it a try tomorrow - hopefully I wont drop them all in the street :crazy:
Be careful though.
Back to back is only for quiet streets.
I once saw a manager playing frogger on a main street.
It was hilarious. :chuckle
Our last revision plan had someone backing a dual carriageway :crazy:
:left: That's mega. :Very Happy :crazy: :sad: :shock: :dance and even :nana
korky
Posts: 797
Joined: 30 Dec 2007, 09:28

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by korky »

fishtank wrote:
Sime83 wrote:Yes I bet it is! I'll give it a try tomorrow - hopefully I wont drop them all in the street :crazy:
Be careful though.
Back to back is only for quiet streets.
I once saw a manager playing frogger on a main street.
It was hilarious. :chuckle
only hilarious if he lost! :left:
or is that too far :crazy:
korky
Posts: 797
Joined: 30 Dec 2007, 09:28

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by korky »

fishtank wrote:Once you have a delivery methods revision this will be very rare.
quite common AFTER our revision, loads of cock ups, a newby going on most duties here would get puzzled and have loads of dead walking for nowt
hampshireman
Posts: 792
Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 15:17
Gender: Male

Re: Tieing Up Backwards

Post by hampshireman »

kawoxux wrote:Why not make the frame in order with the back to back in place.. ie..

57, 55, 53, 56, 54, 52, 51, 49, 47, 50, 48, 46.. etc.

Saves the turning round and won't confuse when someones new to the frame, like this has. Might be a bit confusing to prep, but not that much (all the 50s are the same area, all the 40s, etc..)
See that. But how about it's easy to prep and then have a bagging up sheet. Always works for me