ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Talks Update

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
stubaby
Posts: 220
Joined: 22 May 2007, 19:19

Talks Update

Post by stubaby »

I must firstly say that this is not official but will become common knowledge very soon.
Unless there is a dramatic change around in the next few days we will be resuming our strike very soon.
RM are a f***ing shambles and are so divided between their OWN senior managers its hampering us getting a deal. Many senior managers do NOT want a deal and feel its a climbdown even talking to us.
There has been very little progress on the main issues apart from one. This will not come as a surprise but the CWU are not against later starts and there is an agreement in principle pending us getting a National Agreement on all remaining issues.
From what i can gather the s**t will hit the fan next week and until then our Union will maintain the morale high ground and honour the agreement they signed and will still try to get an agreement.
Get the members ready its not looking good.
the beautiful bd south
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 336
Joined: 06 Jun 2007, 20:48
Location: west riding of yorkshire

Post by the beautiful bd south »

where did you get this information???????

This is an absolute disgrace if this is true and just goes to show how much Royal mail really does not value its employees...
TOO OLD TO DIE YOUNG
madelin4
Posts: 1220
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 16:56

Post by madelin4 »

But sure we dont really know for sure whats going on behind closed doors do we?? So a possible strike cud resume next week we reckon!! It is going to be neverending this! Mayb we will get a deal, u never know. :neutral:
stubaby
Posts: 220
Joined: 22 May 2007, 19:19

Post by stubaby »

Obviously i cannot say who told me this information however they were told this information today by a senior source involved in the talks.
I was in two minds if i should post this because of the blackout but if RM really are not willing to move they are effectively treating their staff with contempt so f**k em.
vigilante
Posts: 1155
Joined: 20 May 2007, 19:13
Gender: Male
Location: dangerously close

deal

Post by vigilante »

MOST SENIOR MANAGERS DON'T WANT A DEAL------THEY ARE QUICK ENOUGH TO FILL THEIR FAT CAT WALLETS WITH UN-EARNED BONUS!!!!!



THE UNION UPPER MIGHT MAKE AN AGREEMENT TO LATE STARTS BUT WE DON'T HAVE TO!!
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Post by lovejoy »

stubaby wrote:Obviously i cannot say who told me this information however they were told this information today by a senior source involved in the talks.
I was in two minds if i should post this because of the blackout but if RM really are not willing to move they are effectively treating their staff with contempt so f**k em.
Fair enough mate but lets see what Tuesday 4th brings! I've spoken to a few people in the know and they say the same thing but Meetings with RM are scheduled for Fri/Mon with a PEC on Tues so we'll all know by then! 5 days is a long time in politics!

If RM are still threatening us then we'll go back out on a function basis again. Simple really. If that is the case then lets all save our criticism for after the dispute and get back out on the street. The first day back out there (if we need to go out) will be the defining day. Royal Mail will know that if even their delay tactics can't break us then they're f****d

We can all say we should do this, that or the other. There are 130,000 opinions out there. The job of Ward and the PEC is to reflect general opinion and I think thus far they have done an excellent job. The enemy is Leighton, Crozier, Brown etc. Lets never lose sight of that!
dw77
Posts: 22
Joined: 17 Aug 2007, 22:18

Post by dw77 »

I heard the same - progress on the early shift starts but not much else. No money this year. The PEC is doing a good job but I am not hearing the same about Dave. Looks like the strike will be back on soon unless theres a big change before Tuesday.
stubaby
Posts: 220
Joined: 22 May 2007, 19:19

Post by stubaby »

lovejoy wrote:
stubaby wrote:Obviously i cannot say who told me this information however they were told this information today by a senior source involved in the talks.
I was in two minds if i should post this because of the blackout but if RM really are not willing to move they are effectively treating their staff with contempt so f**k em.
Fair enough mate but lets see what Tuesday 4th brings! I've spoken to a few people in the know and they say the same thing but Meetings with RM are scheduled for Fri/Mon with a PEC on Tues so we'll all know by then! 5 days is a long time in politics!

If RM are still threatening us then we'll go back out on a function basis again. Simple really. If that is the case then lets all save our criticism for after the dispute and get back out on the street. The first day back out there (if we need to go out) will be the defining day. Royal Mail will know that if even their delay tactics can't break us then they're f****d

We can all say we should do this, that or the other. There are 130,000 opinions out there. The job of Ward and the PEC is to reflect general opinion and I think thus far they have done an excellent job. The enemy is Leighton, Crozier, Brown etc. Lets never lose sight of that!
I actually totally agree with everything you have said mate.
I for one totally support Dave Bob and all the others in their efforts and trust them to make the right decisions on our behalf before a National vote.
Good post.
coppertop
Posts: 229
Joined: 27 May 2007, 17:17

Post by coppertop »

Well put lovejoy totaly agree with you we must all hang fast till 4 sept and then do what is righr for all of us[/center][/url][/quote]
ulster postie
Posts: 503
Joined: 19 May 2007, 14:10
Location: N IRELAND

Post by ulster postie »

ok so if there is an agreement in principle to later starts, WHY THE FCUK ARE H.Q. SENDING OUT ALL THESE RULE 13 BALLOTS, doesnt make sence to me. :crazy:
opg town walk
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Post by DGP1 »

ulster postie wrote:ok so if there is an agreement in principle to later starts, WHY THE FCUK ARE H.Q. SENDING OUT ALL THESE RULE 13 BALLOTS, doesnt make sence to me. :crazy:

I don't think there will be a deal I hope we are back out again from next week :dance
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Post by lovejoy »

ulster postie wrote:ok so if there is an agreement in principle to later starts, WHY THE FCUK ARE H.Q. SENDING OUT ALL THESE RULE 13 BALLOTS, doesnt make sence to me. :crazy:
Because (1) Royal Mail can't be trusted and the union need to cover their backs and (2) the agreement must resolve all issues not just one.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72662
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

ulster postie wrote:ok so if there is an agreement in principle to later starts, WHY THE FCUK ARE H.Q. SENDING OUT ALL THESE RULE 13 BALLOTS, doesnt make sence to me. :crazy:
Because the later starts are being forced in during the so called "period of calm" at least they are in my office hence the meeting tomorrow. I think most know, even if they don't want to accept them, that later starts are going to come in, but we don't want Royal Mail to force them in with no union agreement.

IMHO I think that later starts will be a big mistake for RM. If they are having problems covering duties now when we finish around lunch time how many people will want to do a 2nd duty between 2.00 and 5.00pm (not me)
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
ulster postie wrote:ok so if there is an agreement in principle to later starts, WHY THE FCUK ARE H.Q. SENDING OUT ALL THESE RULE 13 BALLOTS, doesnt make sence to me. :crazy:
Because the later starts are being forced in during the so called "period of calm" at least they are in my office hence the meeting tomorrow. I think most know, even if they don't want to accept them, that later starts are going to come in, but we don't want Royal Mail to force them in with no union agreement.

IMHO I think that later starts will be a big mistake for RM. If they are having problems covering duties now when we finish around lunch time how many people will want to do a 2nd duty between 2.00 and 5.00pm (not me)
They wiil because many of them race around like nutters and load their cars up with both deliveries.
Later starts wouldn't as bad if the CWU could get a deal for earlier finishes on Saturdays
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
ROCKY
Posts: 2801
Joined: 03 Dec 2006, 13:18

Post by ROCKY »

i suspect the intention here is to alter the uso so that we can cover far more del points per person so no o/t will be needed,less van runs mail in late out later on the streets for hours