ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

less diesel used after p+l revision

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
glenfiddich
Posts: 1012
Joined: 03 Oct 2007, 13:15

less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by glenfiddich »

We got told today that our office is using less diesel now than before p+l was introduced with only half the vans we have now.This is due to smaller vans being used and deliveries only going once over the ground not going round in circles with bags bulk and parcels any other offices found this out or are we just a fluke
Image
oypostie
Posts: 914
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 13:39

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by oypostie »

;liar ;liar ;liar
George door to dawes
Posts: 378
Joined: 19 Feb 2011, 17:48
Gender: Female

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by George door to dawes »

Less diesel as you only delivering to each house every other day? :Very Happy
krussel
Posts: 5300
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by krussel »

Suppose it makes some sense as a Bipper must use far less than a Transit van
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
wannabe
Posts: 13
Joined: 14 Feb 2011, 20:41
Gender: Male

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by wannabe »

The Bippers we use are showing an average of 30mpg... what do the Combos et. al achieve?
George door to dawes
Posts: 378
Joined: 19 Feb 2011, 17:48
Gender: Female

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by George door to dawes »

krussel wrote:Suppose it makes some sense as a Bipper must use far less than a Transit van
:hmmmm In all seriousness i dont think it does make sense at all. We have like 4 vans for our division at the moment pre P&L and when we have a revision it will be at least 3-4 times that amount. How is this going to be more fuel efficient? Sure the amount of delivering may be reduced but you then have 3-4 more van trips to the begining of the walks / driving routes and then the return trip to the deport.
krussel
Posts: 5300
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by krussel »

George door to dawes wrote:
krussel wrote:Suppose it makes some sense as a Bipper must use far less than a Transit van
:hmmmm In all seriousness i dont think it does make sense at all. We have like 4 vans for our division at the moment pre P&L and when we have a revision it will be at least 3-4 times that amount. How is this going to be more fuel efficient? Sure the amount of delivering may be reduced but you then have 3-4 more van trips to the begining of the walks / driving routes and then the return trip to the deport.

Fair point but it depends on your support vans.

For example we have 4 support Transits which go around dropping off Posties and then their bags before finally looping the area and dropping parcels. Some then have to drive out and pick a couple of posties up to bring back. Under p/l these vans will not be needed. Yes you will have an increase in small bipper vans but these will drive out to an area and then complete 3 walks including the parcels and drive back.

Stop start work in a Transit must only see say 25 mpg whilst a better run out in a Bipper should return at least 35 mpg if not 40 mpg.

The Transits get used for box collection work in the afternoons but are never even near half full when they return so a Bipper could be used in its place.

It falls down though once you add on tax and servicing of the extra vans :hmmmm Iam not totally sure of the saving there.

What RM want is 2 posties doing 3 rounds between them so if you take off the extra salary it prob swings back again, iam confused now :crazy: :crazy:

Either way its much more walking and work on your back even if its spread out on lighter smaller loads.
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
krussel
Posts: 5300
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by krussel »

wannabe wrote:The Bippers we use are showing an average of 30mpg... what do the Combos et. al achieve?
I never had a trip comp in my Combo but it depends how they are driven. You could prob get near to 40 mpg even around town if driven normally and not thrashed. :hmmmm

I get 45 mpg out of my own diesel car and i dont hang around :hmmmm
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by arnold cheshire »

wannabe wrote:The Bippers we use are showing an average of 30mpg... what do the Combos et. al achieve?
40 mpg on diesel stopping and starting
richystran
Posts: 72
Joined: 20 May 2010, 02:01
Gender: Male

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by richystran »

I think the fiats show between 28-32 on a rural, i would expect the combo to be similar as its the same engine. Not sure about the transhites, but i would say 30mpg!
Its likly that its down to the bipper alone as the hdi engine is a pritty good design with a 50mpg on urban possible, but never go by the onboard computer! its never 100% accurate!
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by arnold cheshire »

richystran wrote:I think the fiats show between 28-32 on a rural, i would expect the combo to be similar as its the same engine. Not sure about the transhites, but i would say 30mpg!
Its likly that its down to the bipper alone as the hdi engine is a pritty good design with a 50mpg on urban possible, but never go by the onboard computer! its never 100% accurate!
combo 40 mpg ldv maxus :dance 20 mpg
richystran
Posts: 72
Joined: 20 May 2010, 02:01
Gender: Male

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by richystran »

bringon4dayweeks wrote:
richystran wrote:I think the fiats show between 28-32 on a rural, i would expect the combo to be similar as its the same engine. Not sure about the transhites, but i would say 30mpg!
Its likly that its down to the bipper alone as the hdi engine is a pritty good design with a 50mpg on urban possible, but never go by the onboard computer! its never 100% accurate!
combo 40 mpg ldv maxus :dance 20 mpg
40 is pritty good for the combo! ldv is pathetic! I think you would be lucky to see 40mpg on our combos as there is no telemitry in our's, that would certainly increase the mpg in our office lol
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by arnold cheshire »

richystran wrote:
bringon4dayweeks wrote:
richystran wrote:I think the fiats show between 28-32 on a rural, i would expect the combo to be similar as its the same engine. Not sure about the transhites, but i would say 30mpg!
Its likly that its down to the bipper alone as the hdi engine is a pritty good design with a 50mpg on urban possible, but never go by the onboard computer! its never 100% accurate!
combo 40 mpg ldv maxus :dance 20 mpg
40 is pritty good for the combo! ldv is pathetic! I think you would be lucky to see 40mpg on our combos as there is no telemitry in our's, that would certainly increase the mpg in our office lol
ldv maxus is 20 mpg there 2.8 diesel stopping and starting :cuppa
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by arnold cheshire »

thats prob why your using less diesel than using the LDV maxus :nana
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: less diesel used after p+l revision

Post by arnold cheshire »

and less driving allowance paid :mad