ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

suspension

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
MISHOCAT
Posts: 4
Joined: 30 Sep 2010, 09:05
Gender: Male

suspension

Post by MISHOCAT »

i've now been suspended for 8 weeks on full pay but i've heard nothing from my manager since 11/10/10. i am not in the union so i'm a bit lost as to the procedure.how long can they keep me suspended without informing me as to what they are doing about my case? i am suspended for apparantley bringing R.M. into disrepute by allegedly posting stuff onto facebook
chickenwittle
Posts: 2092
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by chickenwittle »

should of joined union instead of fishing around here for free advice
MISHOCAT
Posts: 4
Joined: 30 Sep 2010, 09:05
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by MISHOCAT »

would you join an organisation where the rep has tried to have 3 union members sacked because she does not like them?
omega753
Posts: 12
Joined: 13 Mar 2010, 12:53
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by omega753 »

Yes I would as you could always go to an area rep if not happy with office rep.
Thehair
Posts: 221
Joined: 20 Jan 2010, 22:35
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by Thehair »

If you get sacked, you won't be the first or the last for facebook postings, RM or any other company for that matter.
And I'd have joined the union too, at least you wouldn't be defending your case on your jack...Good luck
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by fishtank »

The first thing i would have questioned was the use of Precautionary Suspension.
I can't see why a disrepute charge would necessitate your removal from the workplace.
It's not as if the Mail Integrity was at risk or you were a danger to your colleagues.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
noggin1969
Posts: 1321
Joined: 13 Oct 2009, 17:28
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by noggin1969 »

Simple social networking site rules
Last edited by noggin1969 on 01 Feb 2024, 21:11, edited 1 time in total.
fmrPOSTIE
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 674
Joined: 29 Oct 2008, 20:52
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by fmrPOSTIE »

I have to agree regarding being Suspended from Duty. I cant see a need to Precautionary Suspend you for posting comments about RM on facebook, unless the comments posed a risk to the integrity of the mail. ?
jockstrapp
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 970
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 17:58
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by jockstrapp »

I wish the arseh0les would suspend me for eight weeks on full pay, especially coming upto Christmas pressure. :dance :dance
Pat Ostman
Posts: 2797
Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 21:53
Gender: Male
Location: In the Line Managers office being screwed over.

Re: suspension

Post by Pat Ostman »

Something is not right here, as mentioned you are not a threat to the mail or staff, unless the postings were threats? The only thing they could go for is whistle-blowing and I do believe you have rights there. Official secrets act may apply although whether FaceBook is deemed the correct place to blow your whistles is up for debate.
Examples of the type of malpractice which is covered by the Act include:

criminal offences
non-compliance with the law
miscarriage of justice
danger to health and safety
environmental damage.
http://www.worksmart.org.uk/rights/what ... le_blowing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Royal Mail would need to prove YOU (and nobody else) posted the statement and that would be very difficult. Lets say, for example, your account was hacked? Facebook will not give RM the proof so dont either.
Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun.
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
brothermagrew
Posts: 3015
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
Gender: Male
Location: Shares a border with England to the south.

Re: suspension

Post by brothermagrew »

The folowing should also be borne in mind:

Under Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998 it is an offence to send an indecent, offensive or threatening letter, electronic communication or other article to another person and under Section 43 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 it is a similar offence to send a telephone message that is indecent, offensive or threatening.

The fact that an offensive telephone call, letter e-mail etc. may be received in the course of work and have been sent by a work colleague or manager does not justify the message or prevent it being an offence. Offensive messages sent within the workplace can still constitute criminal offences.
If the e-mails, cyber-bullying etc. causes the victim to fear that violence will be used against them then the police can choose to charge the offender with an offence contrary to Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 which is punishable with up to five years imprisonment and also allows the Court to make a Restraining Order.

If the e-mails, cyber-bullying etc. is racialist in nature or motivated by religious hostility then charges could be brought of Racially or Religiously Aggravated Harassment contrary to Sections 32(1)(a) or 32(1)(b) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

Whilst we do not know or indeed are not party to whatever MISHOCAT actually or allegedly posted onto Facebook, for to be suspended for apparently bringing Royal Mail into disrepute one can only surmise that some form of offensive or derogatory comments may have been made by electronic communication in the form of a posting on Facebook.
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32777
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by POSTMAN »

chickenwittle wrote:should of joined union instead of fishing around here for free advice
May i,RMC is for everyone who works in Royal Mail,union members or not.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
MISHOCAT
Posts: 4
Joined: 30 Sep 2010, 09:05
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by MISHOCAT »

i allegedly refered to a person as an idle arse lickin w****r and the boss as a bumchum because a person was allowed to start work many hours late after a nite on the beer and receive help to complete the delivery whilst leaving half the mail for someone else to redeliver the following day. nowhere on face book does it mention any names including royal mail. my front page does not mention that i work for R.M. and yes my account has been hacked by another person who fortunately for him does not work for R.M. i am also unsure of procedure as i heard nothing for a total of 6weeks (no cotact whatsoever)
graffi
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 186
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 11:34
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by graffi »

Your suspension is reviewed after 48hours then reasonable time after that !!! If you google Royal Mail conduct code it's all in there or go to downloads on here ,,,, 6 weeks without contact !!
borisblank
Posts: 12
Joined: 27 Mar 2010, 10:09
Gender: Male

Re: suspension

Post by borisblank »

Interesting.

I'm no expert but a post on Facebook is not an email or a telephone call - telephones calls and emails are specifically addressed to an individual and can be traced back to the sender/caller. I would certainly argue that;

a) someone else posted the information (how and why you have no idea but there are other people in your house that could have accessed the computer no doubt)

b) Someone must have specifically looked at your Facebook to find the information, so why did they do that and who was it (i.e. somebody possibly has it in for you and is looking to harrass you)

c) In what way does it bring RM into disrepute if RM isn't mentioned, it could have been directed at the US Postal Service or Deutche Post, who can tell.

As mentioned above, they need to prove that you wrote it, that it was directed at RM and that it does bring them into disrepute.