ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

It's a no from my D.O

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

It's a no from my D.O

Post by Big Daz »

The members have returned a no vote for our non sequnced revision by a majority of almost 4 to 1 :neutral:
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16685
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by clashcityrocker »

Why?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
guvenor
Posts: 493
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 16:58

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by guvenor »

cos its brown and dont burn
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by Big Daz »

guvenor wrote:cos its brown and dont burn

:chuckle :chuckle :chuckle :Applause :Applause
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by fishtank »

Big Daz wrote:The members have returned a no vote for our non sequnced revision by a majority of almost 4 to 1 :neutral:

Do you have a plan B?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by Big Daz »

Not yet, released tommrow to go over stuff with DOM and develop plan B Area Rep coming over Monday morning .
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by DGP1 »

Looks like my office will go the same way, people have now seen the new duties and are not happy (I don't think we'll see the planer again).
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
Wild Rover
Posts: 614
Joined: 03 Aug 2007, 17:41
Location: Jockistan

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by Wild Rover »

Glad to see those who voted no have some balls, unlike the CWU reps who are a spineless bunch for wanting to push the revisions through to please management :mad
worktotime
Posts: 2866
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by worktotime »

Wild Rover wrote:Glad to see those who voted no have some balls, unlike the CWU reps who are a spineless bunch for wanting to push the revisions through to please management :mad
the problem in our office we as an office has not voted on anything including the duties , we seem to being push to get these in by 15th nov start and the rep just sits there like a plank , we all know these are not doable in the time , what can we do ?
Exrep
Posts: 1005
Joined: 02 Oct 2009, 21:01
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by Exrep »

WTT stand on the gate mate
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.”
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16685
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by clashcityrocker »

Exrep wrote:WTT stand on the gate mate
Spoken like a true rep.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
kendo1
Posts: 217
Joined: 07 Mar 2010, 12:21
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by kendo1 »

We had our revision ,non Sequenced over a month ago ,
Guess what we are now doing substantial amount of extra work,and still no bonus despite the agreement saying 3 weeks ,and we never got a vote on it simply told it was happening with the CWU in agreement.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by dvbuk55 »

Big Daz wrote:The members have returned a no vote for our non sequnced revision by a majority of almost 4 to 1 :neutral:
I thought you had input in the construction of the new deliveries - were your members not kept in the loop. I thought this wasn't really a revision because no HCTs or CDVs were involved in the new deliveries - which would suggest that it was just a table top walk revision which was a pointless exercise under the circumstances. You need the input for geo route to plan the deliveries - which may bear no relationship whatsoever to what a tabletop exercise produces, so why bother?
ihatedogs
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 547
Joined: 03 Nov 2010, 18:53
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by ihatedogs »

kendo1 wrote:We had our revision ,non Sequenced over a month ago ,
Guess what we are now doing substantial amount of extra work,and still no bonus despite the agreement saying 3 weeks ,and we never got a vote on it simply told it was happening with the CWU in agreement.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: It's a no from my D.O

Post by Big Daz »

dvbuk55 wrote:
Big Daz wrote:The members have returned a no vote for our non sequnced revision by a majority of almost 4 to 1 :neutral:
I thought you had input in the construction of the new deliveries - were your members not kept in the loop. I thought this wasn't really a revision because no HCTs or CDVs were involved in the new deliveries - which would suggest that it was just a table top walk revision which was a pointless exercise under the circumstances. You need the input for geo route to plan the deliveries - which may bear no relationship whatsoever to what a tabletop exercise produces, so why bother?
Why?

Ask those above me, divisonal level agreement I belive to do tabletop due to lack of planners. CWU thinking was release the £200 for members sooner rather than later and get attendance patterns in for the members.

I was expecting planner and pegasus then the above was sprung on us out of the blue.

Mbrs were kept in the loop, but some suffer from parnoia induced by those with vested interests.