ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
dropbag_clone
Posts: 106
Joined: 13 Oct 2007, 10:43

Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by dropbag_clone »

With so many new rules on how we are to do the job, indoor work tools, revision tools, Call Rate Conversion tools, Agreed D2D Guidelines, New Pouch Weight Standard ''' etc etc

Amongst all this has the meal break attendance pattern been altered?


Does this pattern of meal break still stand?

See:
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 36&t=22175" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by gb93 »

I haven't seen anything that would suggest any change to overall meal relief times.I would say the guide posted by postman was still correct
Why ask have you been told different
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
pop it in pete
Posts: 351
Joined: 09 Jun 2007, 23:03
Location: lazy town

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by pop it in pete »

Nowt changed in my office they still dont take the meal breaks, Still come in early still rush around and still think overtime should be in duty time and still think nothing is going to change.
dropbag_clone
Posts: 106
Joined: 13 Oct 2007, 10:43

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by dropbag_clone »

gb93 wrote:]I haven't seen anything that would suggest any change to overall meal relief times.I would say the guide posted by postman was still correct
Why ask have you been told different
Well lets put it this way the manager would have you believe that RM are only obliged to apply the legal break requirements as dictated by UK employment acts, not any agreements made between the CWU and RM itself. Part timers on 4 hour contracts are not then entitled to any break.
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by gb93 »

I would suggest your manager is talking rubbish and if you or anybody else in your office feel agrieved by this managers stance their are options and procedures for you to follow IF you so wish
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

dropbag_clone wrote:
gb93 wrote:]I haven't seen anything that would suggest any change to overall meal relief times.I would say the guide posted by postman was still correct
Why ask have you been told different
Well lets put it this way the manager would have you believe that RM are only obliged to apply the legal break requirements as dictated by UK employment acts, not any agreements made between the CWU and RM itself. Part timers on 4 hour contracts are not then entitled to any break.
As our individual employment contracts all mention a "collective agreements" clause then I would have though his failure to implement or meet any such collective agreement on breaks means he s leaving himself open to legal action on failing to honour a contract of employment.

Would be nice if anyone with experience in employment law could clarify the legal position.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32784
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by POSTMAN »

Nothing has been changed,and there's no doubt we on RMC would know something about it.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Speedydelivery
Posts: 32
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 00:00
Gender: Male

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by Speedydelivery »

gb93 wrote:I would suggest your manager is talking rubbish and if you or anybody else in your office feel agrieved by this managers stance their are options and procedures for you to follow IF you so wish

I think that is one of the reasons why managers get accused of bullying. I have heard the two words bullying and mangers quite alot.
dropbag_clone
Posts: 106
Joined: 13 Oct 2007, 10:43

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by dropbag_clone »

POSTMAN wrote:Nothing has been changed,and there's no doubt we on RMC would know something about it.
Well thats'good to hear.

One more question regarding a part timer on 20 hours (4 hours a day) is the 20 minutes agreed break part of the 4 hours or ontop of the 4 hours?
i.e. 4 hours work plus 20 mins break, or 4 hours including the 20 mins?

Thanks
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Has this changed? "Meal breaks attendance length."

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

included - as it is for 30 hour PT in for 6 hours and FT in for 8 hours.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.